The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis
Open accessAbstract
Disease resistance is associated with a plant defense response that involves an integrated set of signal transduction pathways. Changes in the expression patterns of 2,375 selected genes were examined simultaneously by cDNA microarray analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana after inoculation with an incompatible fungal pathogen Alternaria brassicicola or treatment with the defense-related signaling molecules salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MJ), or ethylene. Substantial changes (up- and down-regulation) in the steady-state abundance of 705 mRNAs were observed in response to one or more of the treatments, including known and putative defense-related genes and 106 genes with no previously described function or homology. In leaf tissue inoculated with A. brassicicola, the abundance of 168 mRNAs was increased more than 2.5-fold, whereas that of 39 mRNAs was reduced. Similarly, the abundance of 192, 221, and 55 mRNAs was highly (>2.5-fold) increased after treatment with SA, MJ, and ethylene, respectively. Data analysis revealed a surprising level of coordinated defense responses, including 169 mRNAs regulated by multiple treatments/defense pathways. The largest number of genes coinduced (one of four induced genes) and corepressed was found after treatments with SA and MJ. In addition, 50% of the genes induced by ethylene treatment were also induced by MJ treatment. These results indicated the existence of a substantial network of regulatory interactions and coordination occurring during plant defense among the different defense signaling pathways, notably between the salicylate and jasmonate pathways that were previously thought to act in an antagonistic fashion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent
Jelinsky, S. A., & Samson, L. D. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1486 · Cited by 419
Cited by
Durrant, W. E., & Dong, X. (2004) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421 · Cited by 3,184
Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease
Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A., & Klessig, D. F. (2009) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202 · Cited by 2,568
Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling
Spaepen, S., Vanderleyden, J., & Remans, R. (2007) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00072.x · Cited by 1,954
Seki, M., Narusaka, M., Ishida, J., Nanjo, T., Fujita, M., Oono, Y., Kamiya, A., Nakajima, M., Enju, A., Sakurai, T., et al. (2002) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01359.x · Cited by 1,924
Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses
Singh, K. (2002) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00289-3 · Cited by 1,381
Metadata
- Authors
- Schenk, P. M., Kazan, K., Wilson, I., Anderson, J. P., Richmond, T., Somerville, S. C., & Manners, J. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-10-10
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 11655-11660
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2094442337
- Cited by
- 1,370
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 142.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.21.11655
- The paper
- Schenk, P. M., Kazan, K., Wilson, I., Anderson, J. P., Richmond, T., Somerville, S. C., & Manners, J. M. (2000). Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.21.11655
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.