The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A census of glutamine/asparagine-rich regions: Implications for their conserved function and the prediction of novel prions
Open accessAbstract
Glutamine/asparagine (Q/N)-rich domains have a high propensity to form self-propagating amyloid fibrils. This phenomenon underlies both prion-based inheritance in yeast and aggregation of a number of proteins involved in human neurodegenerative diseases. To examine the prevalence of this phenomenon, complete proteomic sequences of 31 organisms and several incomplete proteomic sequences were examined for Q/N-rich regions. We found that Q/N-rich regions are essentially absent from the thermophilic bacterial and archaeal proteomes. Moreover, the average Q/N content of the proteins in these organisms is markedly lower than in mesophilic bacteria and eukaryotes. Mesophilic bacterial proteomes contain a small number (0–4) of proteins with Q/N-rich regions. Remarkably, Q/N-rich domains are found in a much larger number of eukaryotic proteins (107–472 per proteome) with diverse biochemical functions. Analyses of these regions argue they have been evolutionarily selected perhaps as modular “polar zipper” protein–protein interaction domains. These data also provide a large pool of potential novel prion-forming proteins, two of which have recently been shown to behave as prions in yeast, thus suggesting that aggregation or prion-like regulation of protein function may be a normal regulatory process for many eukaryotic proteins with a wide variety of functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genes involved in hereditary ataxias
Klockgether, T. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01315-0 · Cited by 83
Cited by
Kato, M., Han, T. W., Xie, S., Shi, K., Du, X., Wu, L. C., Mirzaei, H., Goldsmith, E. J., Longgood, J., Pei, J., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.017 · Cited by 2,012
Prions as adaptive conduits of memory and inheritance
Shorter, J., & Lindquist, S. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1616 · Cited by 555
Tight Regulation of Unstructured Proteins: From Transcript Synthesis to Protein Degradation
Gsponer, J., Futschik, M. E., Teichmann, S. A., & Babu, M. M. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1163581 · Cited by 466
Niwa, T., Ying, B.-W., Saito, K., Jin, W., Takada, S., Ueda, T., & Taguchi, H. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0811922106 · Cited by 321
Fioriti, L., Myers, C., Huang, Y.-Y., Li, X., Stephan, J. S., Trifilieff, P., Colnaghi, L., Kosmidis, S., Drisaldi, B., Pavlopoulos, E., et al. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.021 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Michelitsch, M. D., & Weissman, J. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-10-24
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 11910-11915
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2012385113
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A census of glutamine/asparagine-rich regions: Implications for their conserved function and the prediction of novel prions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.22.11910
- The paper
- Michelitsch, M. D., & Weissman, J. S. (2000). A census of glutamine/asparagine-rich regions: Implications for their conserved function and the prediction of novel prions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.22.11910
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.