Cited by 269Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Peptide nucleic acids rather than RNA may have been the first genetic molecule

Open access
Nelson, Kevin E., Levy, Matthew, Miller, Stanley L.·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Numerous problems exist with the current thinking of RNA as the first genetic material. No plausible prebiotic processes have yet been demonstrated to produce the nucleosides or nucleotides or for efficient two-way nonenzymatic replication. Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) is a promising precursor to RNA, consisting of N -(2-aminoethyl)glycine (AEG) and the adenine, uracil, guanine, and cytosine- N -acetic acids. However, PNA has not yet been demonstrated to be prebiotic. We show here that AEG is produced directly in electric discharge reactions from CH 4 , N 2 , NH 3 , and H 2 O. Electric discharges also produce ethylenediamine, as do NH 4 CN polymerizations. AEG is produced from the robust Strecker synthesis with ethylenediamine. The NH 4 CN polymerization in the presence of glycine leads to the adenine and guanine- N 9 -acetic acids, and the cytosine and uracil- N 1 -acetic acids are produced in high yield from the reaction of cyanoacetaldehyde with hydantoic acid, rather than urea. Preliminary experiments suggest that AEG may polymerize rapidly at 100°C to give the polypeptide backbone of PNA. The ease of synthesis of the components of PNA and possibility of polymerization of AEG reinforce the possibility that PNA may have been the first genetic material.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.97.8.3868

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PNA can be easily synthesized under prebiotic conditions.

    “Additionally, it can be easily synthesized under prebiotic conditions (Nelson et al. 2000).”

    From The Emergence of Life (2019) · cites this paper as Nelson et al. 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, K. E., Levy, M., & Miller, S. L.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-04-11
Volume
97
Issue
8
Pages
3868-3871
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1991122925
Cited by
269
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
peptide nucleic acid, origin of life, prebiotic chemistry, Strecker synthesis, electric discharge synthesis, ethylenediamine, hydantoin, nucleobase synthesis
MeSH terms
Biopolymers, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Ethylenediamines, Glycine, RNA, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Peptide Nucleic Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review