The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cloning of a Novel Phosphoprotein Regulated by Colony-stimulating Factor 1 Shares a Domain with the Drosophiladisabled Gene Product
Abstract
A unique protein with an apparent molecular mass of 96 kilodaltons (p96) was detected in the murine macrophage cell line, BAC1.2F5. The murine cDNA encoding p96 was cloned and sequenced, along with cDNAs representing two alternatively spliced forms of the protein. All three proteins possessed identical amino-terminal domains with significant similarity to the amino-terminal domain of the Drosophila disabled gene product and carboxyl-terminal domains containing proline-rich sequences characteristic of src homology region (domain 3) binding regions. BAC1.2F5 cells predominantly expressed the p96 protein, although mRNA and protein corresponding to the p67 splice variant were also detected. Electrophoretic gel retardation of p96 in response to stimulation of the cells with colony-stimulating factor 1 was noticeable within 5 min after growth factor addition and reached a maximum at 60 min. Metabolic labeling experiments showed that the gel retardation of p96 was associated with increased phosphorylation of the protein exclusively on serine residues. These data identify a novel protein that is phosphorylated in response to mitogenic growth factor stimulation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dab2 acts as a signalling molecule in CSF-1/MCSF signal transduction.
“Dab2 acts as a signalling molecule in CSF-1/MCSF (colony stimulating factor-1/macrophage colony stimulating factor) signal transduction [12,13].”
From Dynamic expression of Dab2 in the mouse embryonic central nervous system (2008) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Bennett, 1992, Development, 116, 953, 10.1242/dev.116.4.953 · DOI
- Blaikie, 1994, J. Biol. Chem., 269, 32031, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)31593-X · DOI
- Bork, 1995, Cell, 80, 693, 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90347-X · DOI · Paper page
- Bradford, 1976, Anal. Biochem., 72, 248, 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Choudhury, 1991, FEBS Lett., 282, 351, 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80511-Z · DOI
- Cooper, 1983, Methods Enzymol., 99, 387, 10.1016/0076-6879(83)99075-4 · DOI
- Downing, 1989, EMBO J., 8, 3345, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08496.x · DOI
- Feng, 1994, Science, 266, 1241, 10.1126/science.7526465 · DOI · Paper page
- Friedrich, 1992, Cell, 70, 81, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90535-K · DOI
- Gertler, 1989, Cell, 58, 103, 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90407-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Gertler, 1993, Genes & Dev., 7, 441, 10.1101/gad.7.3.441 · DOI · Paper page
- Guilbert, 1986, J. Cell. Biochem., 31, 203, 10.1002/jcb.240310303 · DOI
- Imamura, 1990, EMBO J., 9, 2423, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07418.x · DOI
- Kavanaugh, 1994, Science, 266, 1862, 10.1126/science.7527937 · DOI
- Kozak, 1987, Nucleic Acids Res., 15, 8125, 10.1093/nar/15.20.8125 · DOI
- Lee, 1990, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 87, 7270, 10.1073/pnas.87.18.7270 · DOI
- Li, 1991, EMBO J., 10, 277, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07948.x · DOI
- Lim, 1994, Nature, 372, 375, 10.1038/372375a0 · DOI
- Mok, 1994, Gynecol. Oncol., 52, 247, 10.1006/gyno.1994.1040 · DOI · Paper page
- Morgan, 1987, J. Cell. Physiol., 130, 420, 10.1002/jcp.1041300316 · DOI
- Musacchio, 1992, FEBS Lett., 307, 55, 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80901-R · DOI
- Ohtsuka, 1990, Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 1664
- Rettenmier, 1985, Science, 228, 320, 10.1126/science.2580348 · DOI
- Rock, 1992, Mol. Cell. Biol., 12, 2351
- Schwarzbaum, 1984, J. Immunol., 132, 1158, 10.4049/jimmunol.132.3.1158 · DOI
- Sherr, 1991, Trends Genet., 7, 398
- Sherr, 1985, Cell, 41, 665, 10.1016/S0092-8674(85)80047-7 · DOI
- Sparks, 1994, J. Biol. Chem., 269, 23853, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)51013-4 · DOI
- Stanley, 1985, Methods. Enzymol., 116, 564, 10.1016/S0076-6879(85)16044-1 · DOI
- Stanley, 1977, J. Biol. Chem., 252, 4305, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)40265-1 · DOI
- Thomas, 1980, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 77, 5201, 10.1073/pnas.77.9.5201 · DOI
- Thomas, 1992, Cell, 68, 3, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90199-M · DOI
- Tushinski, 1985, J. Cell. Physiol., 122, 221, 10.1002/jcp.1041220210 · DOI
- Ullrich, 1990, Cell, 61, 203, 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90801-K · DOI · Paper page
- Vairo, 1991, Immunol. Today, 12, 362, 10.1016/0167-5699(91)90067-4 · DOI
- Veis, 1991, J. Cell. Physiol., 147, 298, 10.1002/jcp.1041470215 · DOI
- Viguera, 1994, Biochemistry, 33, 10925, 10.1021/bi00202a011 · DOI
- Xu, 1993, Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 1522
- Yeung, 1987, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 84, 1268, 10.1073/pnas.84.5.1268 · DOI
- Yu, 1994, Cell, 76, 933, 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90367-0 · DOI
- Chirgwin, 1979, Biochemistry, 18, 5294, 10.1021/bi00591a005 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scrambler and yotari disrupt the disabled gene and produce a reeler -like phenotype in mice
Sheldon, M., Rice, D. S., D'Arcangelo, G., Yoneshima, H., Nakajima, K., Mikoshiba, K., Howell, B. W., Cooper, J. A., Goldowitz, D., & Curran, T. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/39601 · Cited by 638
Disabled‐2 exhibits the properties of a cargo‐selective endocytic clathrin adaptor
Mishra, S. K., Keyel, P. A., Hawryluk, M. J., Agostinelli, N. R., Watkins, S. C., & Traub, L. M. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf487 · Cited by 302
Cargo- and adaptor-specific mechanisms regulate clathrin-mediated endocytosis
Mettlen, M., Loerke, D., Yarar, D., Danuser, G., & Schmid, S. L. (2010) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200908078 · Cited by 177
Keyel, P. A., Mishra, S. K., Roth, R., Heuser, J. E., Watkins, S. C., & Traub, L. M. (2006) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e06-05-0421 · Cited by 134
Endocytosis and Physiology: Insights from Disabled-2 Deficient Mice
Tao, W., Moore, R., Smith, E. R., & Xu, X.-X. (2016) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2016.00129 · Cited by 43
Self-citationDynamic expression of Dab2 in the mouse embryonic central nervous system
Cheung, K.-K., Mok, S. C., Rezaie, P., & Chan, W. Y. (2008) · BMC Developmental Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-213x-8-76 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, X.-X., Yang, W., Jackowski, S., & Rock, C. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 14184-14191
- ISSN
- 0021-9258
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review