The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cellular and Molecular Barriers to Gene Transfer by a Cationic Lipid
Open accessAbstract
Cationic lipids are widely used for gene transfer in vitro and show promise as a vector for in vivo gene therapy applications. However, there is limited understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved. We investigated the individual steps in cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer to cultured cell lines. We used DMRIE/DOPE (a 1:1 mixture of N-[1-(2,3-dimyristyloxy) propyl]-N,N-dimethyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ammonium bromide (DMRIE) and dioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) as a model lipid because of its efficacy and because it is being used for clinical trials in humans. The data show that cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer is an inefficient process. Part of the inefficiency may result from the fact that the population of lipid-DNA complexes was very heterogeneous, even under conditions that have been optimized to produce the best transfection. Inefficiency was not due to inability of the complex to enter the cells because most cells took up the DNA. However, in contrast to previous speculation, the results indicate that endocytosis was the major mechanism of entry. After endocytosis, the lipid-DNA aggregated into large perinuclear complexes, which often showed a highly ordered tubular structure. Although much of the DNA remained aggregated in a vesicular compartment, there was at least a small amount of DNA in the cytoplasm of most cells. That observation plus results from direct injection of DNA and lipid-DNA into the nucleus and cytoplasm indicate that movement of DNA from the cytoplasm to the nucleus may be one of the most important limitations to successful gene transfer. Finally, before transcription can occur, the data show that lipid and DNA must dissociate. These results provide new insights into the physical limitations to cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer and suggest that attention to specific steps in the cellular process may further improve the efficiency of transfection and increase its use in a number of applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tenchov, R., Bird, R., Curtze, A. E., & Zhou, Q. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c04996 · Cited by 2,221
Block copolymer micelles in nanomedicine applications
Cabral, H., Miyata, K., Osada, K., & Kataoka, K. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00199 · Cited by 1,309
Nano-Flares: Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells
Seferos, D. S., Giljohann, D. A., Hill, H. D., Prigodich, A. E., & Mirkin, C. A. (2007) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0776529 · Cited by 710
Mechanism of oligonucleotide release from cationic liposomes.
Zelphati, O., & Szoka, F. C. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.21.11493 · Cited by 634
Dalby, B. (2004) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2003.11.023 · Cited by 619
Metadata
- Authors
- Zabner, J., Fasbender, A. J., Moninger, T., Poellinger, K. A., & Welsh, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 18997-19007
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086274688
- Cited by
- 1,410
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular and Molecular Barriers to Gene Transfer by a Cationic Lipid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.270.32.18997
- The paper
- Zabner, J., Fasbender, A. J., Moninger, T., Poellinger, K. A., & Welsh, M. J. (1995). Cellular and Molecular Barriers to Gene Transfer by a Cationic Lipid. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.32.18997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.