Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,086

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Exon Recognition in Vertebrate Splicing

Open access
Berget, Susan M.·1995·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The average vertebrate gene consists of multiple small exons (average size, 137 nucleotides) separated by introns that are considerably larger(1). Thus, the vertebrate splicing machinery has the task of finding small desired exons amid much longer introns. The splice site consensus sequences that drive exon recognition are located at the very termini of introns(2, 3). Despite the discriminatory challenge faced during exon recognition in large multiexon premessenger RNAs, vertebrate splice sites are short and poorly conserved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.270.6.2411

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,086

Metadata

Authors
Berget, S. M.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-02
Volume
270
Issue
6
Pages
2411-2414
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027699344
Cited by
1,086
References
0
FWCI
15.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exon Recognition in Vertebrate Splicing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.270.6.2411
The paper
Berget, S. M. (1995). Exon Recognition in Vertebrate Splicing. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.6.2411

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.