The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Stathmin/Tubulin Interaction in Vitro
Open accessAbstract
Stathmin is a highly conserved ubiquitous cytoplasmic protein, phosphorylated in response to extracellular signals and during the cell cycle. Stathmin has recently been shown to destabilize microtubules, but the molecular mechanisms of this function remained unclear. We show here that stathmin directly interacts with tubulin. We assessed the conditions of this interaction and determined some its quantitative parameters using plasmon resonance, gel filtration chromatography, and analytical ultracentrifugation. The stathmin/tubulin interaction leads to the formation of a 7.7 S complex with a 60-A Stokes radius, associating one stathmin with two tubulin heterodimer molecules as determined by direct quantification by Western blotting. This interaction is sensitive to pH and ionic environment. Its equilibrium dissociation constant, determined by plasmon resonance measurement of kinetic constants, has an optimum value of 0.5 microM at pH 6.5. The affinity was lowered with a fully "pseudophosphorylated" 4-Glu mutant form of stathmin, suggesting that it is modulated in vivo by stathmin phosphorylation. Finally, analysis of microtubule dynamics by video microscopy shows that, in our conditions, stathmin reduces the growth rate of microtubules with no effect on the catastrophe frequency. Overall, our results suggest that the stathmin destabilizing activity on microtubules is related to tubulin sequestration by stathmin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic instability of microtubule growth
Mitchison, T., & Kirschner, M. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/312237a0 · Cited by 3,337
Walker, R. A., O'Brien, E. T., Pryer, N. K., Soboeiro, M. F., Voter, W. A., Erickson, H. P., & Salmon, E. D. (1988) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.107.4.1437 · Cited by 980
Cited by
The oncoprotein 18/stathmin family of microtubule destabilizers
Cassimeris, L. (2002) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0955-0674(01)00289-7 · Cited by 432
The establishment of neuronal properties is controlled by Sox4 and Sox11
Bergsland, M., Werme, M., Malewicz, M., Perlmann, T., & Muhr, J. (2006) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.403406 · Cited by 339
Daub, H., Gevaert, K., Vandekerckhove, J., Sobel, A., & Hall, A. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.c000635200 · Cited by 295
Self-citationBaas, P. W., & Qiang, L. (2019) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2019.02.007 · Cited by 123
Repurposing of a DNA segregation machinery into a cytoskeletal system controlling cell shape
(2026) · doi:10.1126/science.aea6343 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Curmi, P. A., Andersen, S. S. L., Lachkar, S., Gavet, O., Karsenti, E., Knossow, M., & Sobel, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 25029-25036
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977721212
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Stathmin/Tubulin Interaction in Vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.272.40.25029
- The paper
- Curmi, P. A., Andersen, S. S. L., Lachkar, S., Gavet, O., Karsenti, E., Knossow, M., & Sobel, A. (1997). The Stathmin/Tubulin Interaction in Vitro. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.40.25029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.