Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nitric Oxide-induced Deamination of Cytosine and Guanine in Deoxynucleosides and Oligonucleotides

Open access
Caulfield, Jennifer L., Wishnok, John S., Tannenbaum, Steven R.·1998·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The autoxidation of nitric oxide (NO.) forms the nitrosating agent N2O3, which can directly damage DNA by deamination of DNA bases following nitrosation of their primary amine functionalities. Within the G:C base pair, deamination results in the formation of xanthine and uracil, respectively. To determine the effect of DNA structure on the deamination of guanine and cytosine, the NO.-induced deamination rate constants for deoxynucleosides, single- and double-stranded oligonucleotides, and a G-quartet oligonucleotide were measured. Deamination rate constants were determined relative to morpholine using a Silastic membrane to deliver NO. at a rate of approximately 10-20 nmol/ml/min for 60 min, yielding a final concentration of approximately 600-1200 microM NO2-. GC/MS analysis revealed formation of nanomolar levels of deamination products from millimolar concentrations of deoxynucleosides and oligomers. Deamination rate constants for cytosine and guanine in all types of DNA were lower than the morpholine nitrosation rate constant by a factor of approximately 10(3)-10(4). Xanthine was formed at twice the rate of uracil, and this may have important consequences for mechanisms of NO.-induced mutations. Single-stranded oligomers were 5 times more reactive than deoxynucleosides toward N2O3. Double-stranded oligomers were 10-fold less reactive than single-stranded oligomers, suggesting that Watson-Crick base pairing protects DNA from deamination. G-quartet structures were also protective, presumably because of hydrogen bonding. These results demonstrate that DNA structure is an important factor in determining the reactivity of DNA bases with NO.-derived species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.273.21.12689

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Caulfield, J. L., Wishnok, J. S., & Tannenbaum, S. R.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
273
Issue
21
Pages
12689-12695
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093143775
Cited by
185
References
4
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitric Oxide-induced Deamination of Cytosine and Guanine in Deoxynucleosides and Oligonucleotides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.273.21.12689
The paper
Caulfield, J. L., Wishnok, J. S., & Tannenbaum, S. R. (1998). Nitric Oxide-induced Deamination of Cytosine and Guanine in Deoxynucleosides and Oligonucleotides. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.21.12689

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.