The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Second-site Cleavage in Sterol Regulatory Element-binding Protein Occurs at Transmembrane Junction as Determined by Cysteine Panning
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When SREBP-2 reaches the Golgi, S1P and S2P sequentially modify SREBP-2 to convert it to active nuclear SREBP-2.
“When SREBP-2 reaches the Golgi, two proteases, site 1 protease (S1P) and site 2 protease (S2P), sequentially modify SREBP-2 to convert it to its active form, designated nuclear SREBP-2 (nSREBP-2)71–73.”
From Pathways and Molecular Mechanisms Governing LDL Receptor Regulation (2025) · cites this paper as [72]
The Abstract describes sequential Site-1 and Site-2 cleavages that release an SREBP fragment, which travels to the nucleus and activates transcription. The Results also show Site-1 cleavage followed by S2P-dependent Site-2 cleavage in SREBP-2. Our copy does not place this processing in the Golgi or explicitly identify the Site-1 protease as S1P. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the Golgi, SREBP is proteolytically activated through sequential cleavage by S1P and S2P (MBTPS1 and MBTPS2), releasing the transcriptionally active N-terminal domain.
“In the Golgi, SREBP is proteolytically activated through sequential cleavage by the proteases S1P and S2P16,17 (encoded by MBTPS1 and MBTPS2), which release the transcriptionally active N-terminal domain of SREBP.”
From Haploid genetic screens identify SPRING/C12ORF49 as a determinant of SREBP signaling and cholesterol metabolism (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Brown, 1997, Cell, 89, 331, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80213-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim, 1996, Genes Dev., 10, 1096, 10.1101/gad.10.9.1096 · DOI
- Ericsson, 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 93, 945, 10.1073/pnas.93.2.945 · DOI
- Guan, 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 21958, 10.1074/jbc.270.37.21958 · DOI
- Vallett, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 12247, 10.1074/jbc.271.21.12247 · DOI
- Bennett, 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 25578, 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25578 · DOI
- Shimano, 1996, J. Clin. Invest., 98, 1575, 10.1172/JCI118951 · DOI
- Ericsson, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 7298, 10.1074/jbc.272.11.7298 · DOI
- Hua, 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 29422, 10.1074/jbc.270.49.29422 · DOI
- Sakai, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 20213, 10.1074/jbc.272.32.20213 · DOI · Paper page
- Sakai, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 5785, 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5785 · DOI
- Sakai, 1996, Cell, 85, 1037, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81304-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Hua, 1996, Cell, 87, 415, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81362-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Duncan, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 12778, 10.1074/jbc.272.19.12778 · DOI · Paper page
- Rawson, 1997, Molecular Cell, 1, 47, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80006-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Hasan, 1994, Somatic Cell Mol. Genet., 20, 183, 10.1007/BF02254759 · DOI
- Hua, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 10379, 10.1074/jbc.271.17.10379 · DOI
- Mocchetti, 1986, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 83, 7221, 10.1073/pnas.83.19.7221 · DOI
- Hua, 1993, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 90, 11603, 10.1073/pnas.90.24.11603 · DOI · Paper page
- Gil, 1985, Cell, 41, 249, 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90078-9 · DOI
- Schägger, 1987, Anal. Biochem., 166, 368, 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90587-2 · DOI
- Akusjärvi, 1987, Mol. Cell. Biol., 7, 549
- Isola, 1989, J. Virol., 63, 2325, 10.1128/jvi.63.5.2325-2334.1989 · DOI
- Sato, 1994, J. Biol. Chem., 269, 17267, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)32550-4 · DOI
- Yang, 1994, Genes Dev., 8, 1910, 10.1101/gad.8.16.1910 · DOI
- Tontonoz, 1993, Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 4753
- Theopold, 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 93, 1195, 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1195 · DOI
- Deisenhofer, 1989, Chem. Scr., 29, 205
- Selkoe, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 18295, 10.1074/jbc.271.31.18295 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ER Stress Induces Cleavage of Membrane-Bound ATF6 by the Same Proteases that Process SREBPs
Ye, J., Rawson, R. B., Komuro, R., Chen, X., Davé, U. P., Prywes, R., Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00133-7 · Cited by 1,871
Self-citationRegulation of Sterol Synthesis in Eukaryotes
Espenshade, P. J., & Hughes, A. L. (2007) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130315 · Cited by 593
The SREBP Pathway in Drosophila
Seegmiller, A. C., Dobrosotskaya, I., Goldstein, J. L., Ho, Y. K., Brown, M. S., & Rawson, R. B. (2002) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/s1534-5807(01)00119-8 · Cited by 194
Self-citationCholesterol: From Feeding to Gene Regulation
Martini, C., & Pallottini, V. (2007) · Genes & Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s12263-007-0049-y · Cited by 53
Loregger, A., Raaben, M., Nieuwenhuis, J., Tan, J. M. E., Jae, L. T., van den Hengel, L. G., Hendrix, S., van den Berg, M., Scheij, S., Song, J.-Y., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14811-1 · Cited by 51
Pathways and Molecular Mechanisms Governing LDL Receptor Regulation
Schmidt, H. M., Jarrett, K. E., de Aguiar Vallim, T. Q., & Tarling, E. J. (2025) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.124.323578 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Duncan, E. A., Davé, U. P., Sakai, J., Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- 17801-17809
- ISSN
- 0021-9258
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review