Cited by 139

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alternative, Non-secretase Processing of Alzheimer's β-Amyloid Precursor Protein during Apoptosis by Caspase-6 and -8

Pellegrini, Luca, Passer, Brent J., Tabaton, Massimo, Ganjei, J. Kelly, D'Adamio, Luciano·1999·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. Although the pathogenesis of AD is unknown, it is widely accepted that AD is caused by extracellular accumulation of a neurotoxic peptide, known as Abeta. Mutations in the beta-amyloid precursor protein (APP), from which Abeta arises by proteolysis, are associated with some forms of familial AD (FAD) and result in increased Abeta production. Two other FAD genes, presenilin-1 and -2, have also been shown to regulate Abeta production; however, studies examining the biological role of these FAD genes suggest an alternative theory for the pathogenesis of AD. In fact, all three genes have been shown to regulate programmed cell death, hinting at the possibility that dysregulation of apoptosis plays a primary role in causing neuronal loss in AD. In an attempt to reconcile these two hypotheses, we investigated APP processing during apoptosis and found that APP is processed by the cell death proteases caspase-6 and -8. APP is cleaved by caspases in the intracellular portion of the protein, in a site distinct from those processed by secretases. Moreover, it represents a general effect of apoptosis, because it occurs during cell death induced by several stimuli both in T cells and in neuronal cells.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.274.30.21011

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caspase-3, -6 and -8 cleave APP mainly between amino acids V664-D665 (APP695 numbering) within the intracytoplasmic domain.

    “Several studies have demonstrated in a variety of culture cell systems the ability of caspase-3, -6 and -8 to cleave APP, mainly between amino acids V664-D665 (APP695 numbering) within the intracytoplasmic domain (Gervais et al., 1999; LeBlanc et al., 1999; Pellegrini et al., 1999; Weidemann et al., 1999).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Price, 1998, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 21, 479, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.479 · DOI
  2. Haass, 1993, Cell, 75, 1039, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90312-E · DOI · Paper page
  3. Rogaev, 1995, Nature, 376, 775, 10.1038/376775a0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. De Strooper, 1998, Nature, 391, 387, 10.1038/34910 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Duff, 1996, Nature, 383, 710, 10.1038/383710a0 · DOI
  6. Vito, 1996, Science, 271, 521, 10.1126/science.271.5248.521 · DOI
  7. Wolozin, 1996, Science, 274, 1710, 10.1126/science.274.5293.1710 · DOI
  8. Vito, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 31025, 10.1074/jbc.271.49.31025 · DOI
  9. Guo, 1996, Neuroreport, 8, 379, 10.1097/00001756-199612200-00074 · DOI
  10. Guo, 1997, J. Neurosci., 17, 4212, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04212.1997 · DOI
  11. Yamatsuji, 1996, EMBO J., 15, 498, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00382.x · DOI
  12. Giambarella, 1997, EMBO J., 16, 4897, 10.1093/emboj/16.16.4897 · DOI
  13. Loetscher, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 20655, 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20655 · DOI
  14. Kim, 1997, Science, 277, 373, 10.1126/science.277.5324.373 · DOI
  15. Vito, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 28315, 10.1074/jbc.272.45.28315 · DOI
  16. Kuida, 1996, Nature, 384, 368, 10.1038/384368a0 · DOI
  17. Galli, 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 1247, 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1247 · DOI
  18. LeBlanc, 1995, J. Neurosci., 15, 7837, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-12-07837.1995 · DOI
  19. Selkoe, 1988, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 85, 7341, 10.1073/pnas.85.19.7341 · DOI
  20. Podlisny, 1991, Am. J. Pathol., 138, 1423
  21. Slee, 1999, J. Cell Biol., 144, 281, 10.1083/jcb.144.2.281 · DOI
  22. Martin, 1995, Cell, 82, 349, 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90422-0 · DOI
  23. Henkart, 1996, Immunity, 4, 195, 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80428-8 · DOI
  24. Lazebnik, 1994, Nature, 371, 346, 10.1038/371346a0 · DOI
  25. Talanian, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 9677, 10.1074/jbc.272.15.9677 · DOI
  26. Rotonda, 1996, Nat. Struct. Biol., 3, 619, 10.1038/nsb0796-619 · DOI
  27. Rano, 1997, Chem. Biol., 4, 149, 10.1016/S1074-5521(97)90258-1 · DOI
  28. Muzio, 1996, Cell, 85, 817, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81266-0 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Boldin, 1996, Cell, 85, 803, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81265-9 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Barnes, 1998, J. Neurosci., 18, 5869, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-15-05869.1998 · DOI
  31. Weidemann, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 5823, 10.1074/jbc.274.9.5823 · DOI
  32. Liu, 1997, Cell, 89, 175, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80197-X · DOI
  33. Sakahira, 1998, Nature, 391, 96, 10.1038/34214 · DOI
  34. Luo, 1998, Cell, 94, 481, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81589-5 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Cheng, 1997, Science, 278, 1966, 10.1126/science.278.5345.1966 · DOI
  36. Guenette, 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 93, 10832, 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10832 · DOI
  37. Borg, 1996, Mol. Cell. Biol., Nov, 6229, 10.1128/MCB.16.11.6229 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Weidemann, 1989, Cell, 57, 115, 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90177-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pellegrini, L., Passer, B. J., Tabaton, M., Ganjei, J. K., & D'Adamio, L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-07
Volume
274
Issue
30
Pages
21011-21016
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
139
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review