Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recycling of Apolipoprotein E and Lipoprotein Lipase through Endosomal Compartments in Vivo

Heeren, Joerg, Grewal, Thomas, Jäckle, Stefan, Beisiegel, Ulrike·2001·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

We have recently described a novel recycling pathway of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL)-associated apolipoprotein (apo) E in human hepatoma cells. We now demonstrate that not only TRL-derived apoE but also lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is efficiently recycled in vitro and in vivo. Similar recycling kinetics of apoE and LPL in normal and low density lipoprotein receptor-negative human fibroblasts also indicate that the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein seems to be involved. Intracellular sorting mechanisms are responsible for reduced lysosomal degradation of both ligands after receptor-mediated internalization. Immediately after internalization in rat liver, TRLs are disintegrated, and apoE and LPL are found in endosomal compartments, whereas TRL-derived phospholipids accumulate in the perinuclear region of hepatocytes. Subsequently, substantial amounts of both proteins can be found in purified recycling endosomes, indicating a potential resecretion of these TRL components. Pulse-chase experiments of perfused rat livers with radiolabeled TRLs demonstrated a serum-induced release of internalized apoE and LPL into the perfusate. Analysis of the secreted proteins identified approximately 80% of the recycled TRL-derived proteins in the high density lipoprotein fractions. These results provide the first evidence that recycling of TRL-derived apoE and LPL could play an important role in the modulation of lipoproteins in vivo.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m107461200

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Olivecrona, 1995, Curr. Opin. Lipidol., 6, 291, 10.1097/00041433-199510000-00009 · DOI
  2. Mahley, 1999, J. Lipid Res., 40, 1, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)33334-4 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Felts, 1975, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 66, 1467, 10.1016/0006-291X(75)90524-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Goldberg, 1996, J. Lipid Res., 37, 693, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)37569-6 · DOI
  5. Zambon, 1996, J. Lipid Res., 37, 2394, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)37488-5 · DOI
  6. Heeren, 2001, Curr. Opin. Lipidol., 12, 255, 10.1097/00041433-200106000-00003 · DOI
  7. Beisiegel, 1989, Nature, 341, 162, 10.1038/341162a0 · DOI
  8. Beisiegel, 1997, Proc. Nutr. Soc., 56, 731, 10.1079/PNS19970073 · DOI
  9. Kowal, 1989, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 86, 5810, 10.1073/pnas.86.15.5810 · DOI
  10. Bradley, 1986, J. Lipid Res., 27, 40, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)38865-9 · DOI
  11. Willnow, 1994, Science, 264, 1471, 10.1126/science.7515194 · DOI
  12. Willnow, 1999, Nat. Cell Biol., 1, E157, 10.1038/14109 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Brown, 1986, Science, 232, 34, 10.1126/science.3513311 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Tabas, 1990, J. Cell Biol., 111, 929, 10.1083/jcb.111.3.929 · DOI
  15. Tabas, 1991, J. Cell Biol., 115, 1547, 10.1083/jcb.115.6.1547 · DOI
  16. Myers, 1993, J. Cell Biol., 123, 1389, 10.1083/jcb.123.6.1389 · DOI
  17. Lombardi, 1993, J. Biol. Chem., 268, 26113, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)74288-4 · DOI
  18. Jones, 1984, J. Lipid Res., 25, 1151, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)34458-8 · DOI
  19. Heeren, 1999, J. Cell Sci., 112, 349, 10.1242/jcs.112.3.349 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Fazio, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 8247, 10.1074/jbc.274.12.8247 · DOI
  21. Swift, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 22965, 10.1074/jbc.M100172200 · DOI
  22. Herz, 1988, EMBO J., 7, 4119, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03306.x · DOI
  23. Lookene, 1994, Eur. J. Biochem., 222, 395, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18878.x · DOI
  24. Goldstein, 1983, Methods Enzymol., 98, 241, 10.1016/0076-6879(83)98152-1 · DOI
  25. Belcher, 1987, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 84, 6785, 10.1073/pnas.84.19.6785 · DOI
  26. Havel, 1986, Methods Enzymol., 129, 591, 10.1016/0076-6879(86)29093-X · DOI
  27. Pol, 1997, Biochem. J., 323, 435, 10.1042/bj3230435 · DOI
  28. Enrich, 1999, Hepatology, 30, 1115, 10.1002/hep.510300505 · DOI
  29. Jackle, 1991, J. Lipid Res., 32, 485, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)42072-3 · DOI
  30. Pol, 1997, Electrophoresis, 18, 2548, 10.1002/elps.1150181410 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Heeren, J., Grewal, T., Jäckle, S., & Beisiegel, U.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-11
Volume
276
Issue
45
Pages
42333-42338
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
55
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review