Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Phox Homology (PX) Domain-dependent, 3-Phosphoinositide-mediated Association of Sorting Nexin-1 with an Early Sorting Endosomal Compartment Is Required for Its Ability to Regulate Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Degradation

Cozier, Gyles E., Carlton, Jez, McGregor, Alex H., Gleeson, Paul A., Teasdale, Rohan D., Mellor, Harry, Cullen, Peter J.·2002·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m206986200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prolonged overexpression of SNX17-FLAG in CHO cells resulted in the formation of large abnormal vesicular structures reminiscent of disrupted endosomes seen in cells overexpressing Rab-5 or sorting nexin-1.

    “Prolonged overexpression of SNX17-FLAG in CHO cells resulted in the formation of large abnormal vesicular structures (Fig. 9C, panels a and d) reminiscent of the disrupted endosomes seen in cells seen in cells overexpressing Rab-5 (21) or sorting nexin-1 (20).”

    From Sorting Motifs in the Intracellular Domain of the Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Interact with a Novel Domain of Sorting Nexin-17 (2004) · cites this paper as [20]

    The citation is attached to the comparison with cells overexpressing sorting nexin-1, not to the citing authors’ SNX17-FLAG observation. The Results (page unavailable) show GFP-SNX1 in punctate structures that partially overlap with an early-endosomal marker, but do not report large abnormal vesicles or disrupted endosomes after SNX1 overexpression. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Endogenous SNX17 localizes to endosomes and this is disrupted by substitution of a critical lysine residue, as has been found for SNX1.

    “We have found that endogenous SNX17 localizes to endosomes and that this is disrupted by substitution of a critical lysine residue, as has been found for SNX1 (20).”
  • Substitution of a critical lysine residue in the PX domain of SNX1 disrupts its ability to bind phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and thereby localize in early endosomes.

    “For example, substitution of a critical lysine residue in the PX domain of SNX 1 has been shown to disrupt its ability to bind to phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and thereby localize in early endosomes (20).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Vanhaesebroeck, 2001, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 70, 535, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.535 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Toker, 1997, Nature, 387, 673, 10.1038/42648 · DOI
  3. Teruel, 2000, Cell, 103, 181, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00109-4 · DOI
  4. Hurley, 2001, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 13, 146, 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00191-5 · DOI
  5. Cullen, 2001, Curr. Biol., 11, R882, 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00523-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Lemmon, 2000, Biochem. J., 350, 1, 10.1042/bj3500001 · DOI
  7. Itoh, 2001, Science, 291, 1047, 10.1126/science.291.5506.1047 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ford, 2001, Science, 291, 1051, 10.1126/science.291.5506.1051 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Ponting, 1996, Protein Sci., 5, 2353, 10.1002/pro.5560051122 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Sato, 2001, Science, 294, 1881, 10.1126/science.1065763 · DOI
  11. Simonsen, 2001, Nat. Cell. Bio., 3, E179, 10.1038/35087112 · DOI
  12. Wishart, 2001, Cell, 105, 817, 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00414-7 · DOI
  13. Xu, 2001, Biochem. J., 360, 513, 10.1042/bj3600513 · DOI
  14. Ellson, 2002, J. Cell Sci., 115, 1099, 10.1242/jcs.115.6.1099 · DOI
  15. Xu, 2001, Nat. Cell. Bio., 3, 658, 10.1038/35083051 · DOI
  16. Cheever, 2001, Nat. Cell. Bio., 3, 613, 10.1038/35083000 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kanai, 2001, Nat. Cell. Bio., 3, 675, 10.1038/35083070 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ellson, 2001, Nat. Cell. Bio., 3, 679, 10.1038/35083076 · DOI
  19. Song, 2001, Biochemistry, 40, 8940, 10.1021/bi0155100 · DOI
  20. Jun, 2001, J. Cell Biol., 154, 699, 10.1083/jcb.200105089 · DOI
  21. Virbasius, 2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 98, 12908, 10.1073/pnas.221352898 · DOI
  22. Ago, 2001, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 287, 733, 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5629 · DOI
  23. Yu, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 44179, 10.1074/jbc.M108811200 · DOI
  24. Zhan, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 4512, 10.1074/jbc.M109520200 · DOI
  25. Bravo, 2001, Mol. Cell, 8, 829, 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00372-0 · DOI
  26. Dumas, 2001, Mol. Cell, 8, 947, 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00385-9 · DOI
  27. Misra, 2001, Cell, 107, 559, 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00594-3 · DOI
  28. Zhong, 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 6767, 10.1073/pnas.092142699 · DOI
  29. Cozier, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 28261, 10.1074/jbc.M000469200 · DOI
  30. Teasdale, 2001, Biochem. J., 358, 7, 10.1042/bj3580007 · DOI
  31. Dowler, 1999, Biochem. J., 342, 7, 10.1042/bj3420007 · DOI
  32. Venkateswarlu, 1998, Biochem. J., 335, 139, 10.1042/bj3350139 · DOI
  33. Lockyer, 1997, Curr. Biol., 7, 1007, 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00423-4 · DOI
  34. Stevenson, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 22761, 10.1074/jbc.273.35.22761 · DOI
  35. Deak, 1999, FEBS Lett., 451, 220, 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00556-6 · DOI
  36. Venkateswarlu, 1998, Curr. Biol., 8, 463, 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70181-2 · DOI
  37. Kurten, 1996, Science, 272, 1008, 10.1126/science.272.5264.1008 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Kurten, 2001, J. Cell Sci., 114, 1743, 10.1242/jcs.114.9.1743 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Oatey, 1999, Biochem. J., 344, 511, 10.1042/bj3440511 · DOI
  40. Watton, 1999, Curr. Biol., 9, 433, 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80192-4 · DOI
  41. Balla, 2000, Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 21, 238, 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01500-5 · DOI
  42. Gillooly, 2000, EMBO J., 19, 4577, 10.1093/emboj/19.17.4577 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Pattni, 2001, Curr. Biol., 11, 1636, 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00486-9 · DOI
  44. Gampel, 1999, Curr. Biol., 9, 955, 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80422-9 · DOI
  45. Odorizzi, 2000, Trends Biochem. Sci., 25, 229, 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01543-7 · DOI
  46. Gary, 1998, J. Cell Biol., 143, 65, 10.1083/jcb.143.1.65 · DOI
  47. Cooke, 1998, Curr. Biol., 8, 1219, 10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00513-1 · DOI
  48. Odorizzi, 1998, Cell, 95, 847, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81707-9 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Shisheva, 2001, Cell Biol. Int., 25, 1201, 10.1006/cbir.2001.0803 · DOI
  50. Shisheva, 1999, Mol. Cell. Biol., 19, 623, 10.1128/MCB.19.1.623 · DOI
  51. McEwen, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 33905, 10.1074/jbc.274.48.33905 · DOI
  52. Shrissa, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 21589, 10.1074/jbc.274.31.21589 · DOI
  53. Ikonomov, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 26141, 10.1074/jbc.M101722200 · DOI
  54. Gillooly, 2001, Biochem. J., 355, 249, 10.1042/bj3550249 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cozier, G. E., Carlton, J., McGregor, A. H., Gleeson, P. A., Teasdale, R. D., Mellor, H., & Cullen, P. J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-12
Volume
277
Issue
50
Pages
48730-48736
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
164
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review