Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 476

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transcriptional Regulation of Biomass-degrading Enzymes in the Filamentous Fungus Trichoderma reesei

Open access
Foreman, Pamela K., Brown, Doug, Dankmeyer, Lydia, Dean, Ralph, Diener, Stephen, Dunn-Coleman, Nigel S., Goedegebuur, Frits, Houfek, Thomas D., England, George J., Kelley, Aaron S., Meerman, Hendrik J., Mitchell, Thomas, Mitchinson, Colin, Olivares, Heather A., Teunissen, Pauline J.M., Yao, Jian, Ward, Michael·2003·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei produces and secretes profuse quantities of enzymes that act synergistically to degrade cellulase and related biomass components. We partially sequenced over 5100 random T. reesei cDNA clones. Among the sequences whose predicted gene products had significant similarity to known proteins, 12 were identified that encode previously unknown enzymes that likely function in biomass degradation. Microarrays were used to query the expression levels of each of the sequences under different conditions known to induce cellulolytic enzyme synthesis. Most of the genes encoding known and putative biomass-degrading enzymes were transcriptionally co-regulated. Moreover, despite the fact that several of these enzymes are not thought to degrade cellulase directly, they were coordinately overexpressed in a cellulase overproducing strain. A variety of additional sequences whose function could not be ascribed using the limited sequence available displayed analogous behavior and may also play a role in biomass degradation or in the synthesis of biomass-degrading enzymes. Sequences exhibiting additional regulatory patterns were observed that might reflect roles in regulation of cellulase biosynthesis. However, genes whose products are involved in protein processing and secretion were not highly regulated during cellulase induction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m304750200

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 476

Metadata

Authors
Foreman, P. K., Brown, D., Dankmeyer, L., Dean, R., Diener, S., Dunn-Coleman, N. S., Goedegebuur, F., Houfek, T. D., England, G. J., Kelley, A. S., Meerman, H. J., Mitchell, T., Mitchinson, C., Olivares, H. A., Teunissen, P. J. M., Yao, J., & Ward, M.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
278
Issue
34
Pages
31988-31997
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127500237
Cited by
476
References
2
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcriptional Regulation of Biomass-degrading Enzymes in the Filamentous Fungus Trichoderma reesei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m304750200
The paper
Foreman, P. K., Brown, D., Dankmeyer, L., Dean, R., Diener, S., Dunn-Coleman, N. S., Goedegebuur, F., Houfek, T. D., England, G. J., Kelley, A. S., Meerman, H. J., Mitchell, T., Mitchinson, C., Olivares, H. A., Teunissen, P. J. M., Yao, J., & Ward, M. (2003). Transcriptional Regulation of Biomass-degrading Enzymes in the Filamentous Fungus Trichoderma reesei. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m304750200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.