Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maturation of the Epithelial Na+ Channel Involves Proteolytic Processing of the α- and γ-Subunits

Open access
Hughey, Rebecca P., Mueller, Gunhild M., Bruns, James B., Kinlough, Carol L., Poland, Paul A., Harkleroad, Keri L., Carattino, Marcelo D., Kleyman, Thomas R.·2003·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) is a tetramer of two alpha-, one beta-, and one gamma-subunit, but little is known about its assembly and processing. Because co-expression of mouse ENaC subunits with three different carboxyl-terminal epitope tags produced an amiloride-sensitive sodium current in oocytes, these tagged subunits were expressed in both Chinese hamster ovary or Madin-Darby canine kidney type 1 epithelial cells for further study. When expressed alone alpha-(95 kDa), beta-(96 kDa), and gamma-subunits (93 kDa) each produced a single band on SDS gels by immunoblotting. However, co-expression of alphabetagammaENaC subunits revealed a second band for each subunit (65 kDa for alpha, 110 kDa for beta, and 75 kDa for gamma) that exhibited N-glycans that had been processed to complex type based on sensitivity to treatment with neuraminidase, resistance to cleavage by endoglycosidase H, and GalNAc-independent labeling with [3H]Gal in glycosylation-defective Chinese hamster ovary cells (ldlD). The smaller size of the processed alpha- and gamma-subunits is also consistent with proteolytic cleavage. By using alpha- and gamma-subunits with epitope tags at both the amino and carboxyl termini, proteolytic processing of the alpha- and gamma-subunits was confirmed by isolation of an additional epitope-tagged fragment from the amino terminus (30 kDa for alpha and 18 kDa for gamma) consistent with cleavage within the extracellular loop. The fragments remain stably associated with the channel as shown by immunoblotting of co-immunoprecipitates, suggesting that proteolytic cleavage represents maturation rather than degradation of the channel.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m307003200

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Hughey, R. P., Mueller, G. M., Bruns, J. B., Kinlough, C. L., Poland, P. A., Harkleroad, K. L., Carattino, M. D., & Kleyman, T. R.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
278
Issue
39
Pages
37073-37082
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034728504
Cited by
268
References
33
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maturation of the Epithelial Na+ Channel Involves Proteolytic Processing of the α- and γ-Subunits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m307003200
The paper
Hughey, R. P., Mueller, G. M., Bruns, J. B., Kinlough, C. L., Poland, P. A., Harkleroad, K. L., Carattino, M. D., & Kleyman, T. R. (2003). Maturation of the Epithelial Na+ Channel Involves Proteolytic Processing of the α- and γ-Subunits. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m307003200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.