Cited by 86

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nedd4-2 Induces Endocytosis and Degradation of Proteolytically Cleaved Epithelial Na+ Channels

Kabra, Rajesh, Knight, Kristin K., Zhou, Ruifeng, Snyder, Peter M.·2008·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

As a pathway for Na(+) reabsorption, the epithelial Na(+) channel ENaC is critical for Na(+) homeostasis and blood pressure control. Na(+) transport is regulated by Nedd4-2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that decreases ENaC expression at the cell surface. To investigate the underlying mechanisms, we proteolytically cleaved/activated ENaC at the cell surface and then quantitated the rate of disappearance of cleaved channels using electrophysiological and biochemical assays. We found that cleaved ENaC channels were rapidly removed from the cell surface. Deletion or mutation of the Nedd4-2 binding motifs in alpha, beta, and gammaENaC dramatically reduced endocytosis, whereas a mutation that disrupts a YXXØ endocytosis motif had no effect. ENaC endocytosis was also decreased by silencing of Nedd4-2 and by expression of a dominant negative Nedd4-2 construct. Conversely, Nedd4-2 overexpression increased ENaC endocytosis in human embryonic kidney 293 cells but had no effect in Fischer rat thyroid epithelia. In addition to its effect on endocytosis, Nedd4-2 also increased the rate of degradation of the cell surface pool of cleaved alphaENaC. Together the data indicate that Nedd4-2 reduces ENaC surface expression by altering its trafficking at two distinct sites in the endocytic pathway, inducing endocytosis of cleaved channels and targeting them for degradation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m708555200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Schild, 2004, Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol., 151, 93, 10.1007/s10254-004-0023-7 · DOI
  2. Snyder, 2005, Endocrinology, 146, 5079, 10.1210/en.2005-0894 · DOI
  3. Lifton, 1996, Science, 272, 676, 10.1126/science.272.5262.676 · DOI
  4. Boucher, 1986, J. Clin. Investig., 78, 1245, 10.1172/JCI112708 · DOI
  5. Kamynina, 2001, FASEB J., 15, 204, 10.1096/fj.00-0191com · DOI
  6. Debonneville, 2001, EMBO J., 20, 7052, 10.1093/emboj/20.24.7052 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Knight, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 2805, 10.1073/pnas.0511184103 · DOI
  8. Snyder, 1995, Cell, 83, 969, 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90212-0 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Schild, 1996, EMBO J., 15, 2381, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00594.x · DOI
  10. Goulet, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 30012, 10.1074/jbc.273.45.30012 · DOI
  11. Firsov, 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 93, 15370, 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15370 · DOI
  12. Snyder, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 5, 10.1074/jbc.C100623200 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Snyder, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 45753, 10.1074/jbc.M407858200 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Itani, 2005, Am. J. Physiol., 289, F334
  15. Staub, 1997, EMBO J., 16, 6325, 10.1093/emboj/16.21.6325 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Malik, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 12903, 10.1074/jbc.M010626200 · DOI
  17. Malik, 2005, Am. J. Physiol., 289, F107
  18. Zhou, 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 20207, 10.1074/jbc.M611329200 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Wiemuth, 2007, Biochem. J., 405, 147, 10.1042/BJ20060747 · DOI
  20. Chraibi, 1998, J. Gen. Physiol., 111, 127, 10.1085/jgp.111.1.127 · DOI
  21. Kleyman, 2006, Kidney Int., 70, 1391, 10.1038/sj.ki.5001860 · DOI
  22. Hughey, 2007, Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens., 16, 444, 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32821f6072 · DOI
  23. Caldwell, 2004, Am. J. Physiol., 286, C190, 10.1152/ajpcell.00342.2003 · DOI
  24. McDonald, 1994, Am. J. Physiol., 266, L728
  25. McDonald, 1995, Am. J. Physiol., 268, C1157, 10.1152/ajpcell.1995.268.5.C1157 · DOI
  26. Snyder, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 5042, 10.1074/jbc.M312477200 · DOI
  27. Hughey, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 18111, 10.1074/jbc.C400080200 · DOI
  28. Hughey, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 48491, 10.1074/jbc.C400460200 · DOI
  29. Bruns, 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 6153, 10.1074/jbc.M610636200 · DOI
  30. Snyder, 2000, J. Clin. Investig., 105, 45, 10.1172/JCI7869 · DOI
  31. Lu, 2007, Traffic, 8, 1246, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00602.x · DOI
  32. Volk, 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 18348, 10.1074/jbc.M413689200 · DOI
  33. Hughey, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 37073, 10.1074/jbc.M307003200 · DOI
  34. Carattino, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 18901, 10.1074/jbc.M604109200 · DOI
  35. Chen, 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 92, 7819, 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7819 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Kanelis, 2001, Nat. Struct. Biol., 8, 407, 10.1038/87562 · DOI
  37. Henry, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 20019, 10.1074/jbc.M211153200 · DOI
  38. Staruschenko, 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 39161, 10.1074/jbc.M509608200 · DOI
  39. Wang, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 14129, 10.1074/jbc.M512511200 · DOI
  40. Butterworth, 2005, J. Gen. Physiol., 125, 81, 10.1085/jgp.200409124 · DOI
  41. Shimkets, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 25537, 10.1074/jbc.272.41.25537 · DOI
  42. Mohan, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 32071, 10.1074/jbc.M405091200 · DOI
  43. Hanwell, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 9772, 10.1074/jbc.M110904200 · DOI
  44. Russo, 2005, Hypertension, 46, 488, 10.1161/01.HYP.0000178594.63193.c0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kabra, R., Knight, K. K., Zhou, R., & Snyder, P. M.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
283
Issue
10
Pages
6033-6039
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
86
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review