Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Glycan Array Screening Reveals a Candidate Ligand for Siglec-8*

Open access
Bochner, Bruce S., Alvarez, Richard A., Mehta, Padmaja, Bovin, Nicolai V., Blixt, Ola, White, John R., Schnaar, Ronald L.·2005·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin 8 (Siglec-8) is selectively expressed on human eosinophils, basophils, and mast cells, where it regulates their function and survival. Previous studies demonstrated sialic acid-dependent binding of Siglec-8 but failed to reveal significant substructure specificity or high affinity of that binding. To test a broader range of potential ligands, a Siglec-8-Ig chimeric protein was tested for binding to 172 different glycan structures immobilized as biotinylated glycosides on a 384-well streptavidin-coated plate. Of these, approximately 40 structures were sialylated. Among these, avid binding was detected to a single defined glycan, NeuAcalpha2-3(6-O-sulfo)Galbeta1-4[Fucalpha1-3]GlcNAc, also referred to in the literature as 6'-sulfo-sLex. Notably, neither unsulfated sLex (NeuAcalpha2-3Galbeta1-4[Fucalpha1-3]GlcNAc) nor an isomer with the sulfate on the 6-position of the GlcNAc residue (6-sulfo-sLex, NeuAcalpha2-3Galbeta1-4[Fucalpha1-3](6-O-sulfo)GlcNAc) supported detectable binding. Subsequent secondary screening was performed using surface plasmon resonance. Biotin glycosides immobilized on streptavidin biosensor chips were exposed to Siglec-8-Ig in solution. Whereas surfaces derivatized with sLex and 6-sulfo-sLex failed to support detectable Siglec-8 binding, 6'-sulfo-sLex supported significant binding with a Kd of 2.3 microm. In a separate test of binding specificity, aminopropyl glycosides were covalently immobilized at different concentrations on activated (N-hydroxysuccinimidyl) glass surfaces (Schott-Nexterion Slide H). Subsequent exposure to Siglec-8-Ig precomplexed with fluorescein isothiocyanate anti-human Fc resulted in fluorescent signals at immobilized concentrations of 6'-sulfo-sLex of <5 pmol/spot. In contrast, sLex and 6-sulfo-sLex did not support any Siglec-8 binding at the highest concentration tested (300 pmol/spot). We conclude that Siglec-8 binds preferentially to the sLex structure bearing an additional sulfate ester on the galactose 6-hydroxyl.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m412378200

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Bochner, B. S., Alvarez, R. A., Mehta, P., Bovin, N. V., Blixt, O., White, J. R., & Schnaar, R. L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
280
Issue
6
Pages
4307-4312
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077521688
Cited by
262
References
37
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glycan Array Screening Reveals a Candidate Ligand for Siglec-8*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m412378200
The paper
Bochner, B. S., Alvarez, R. A., Mehta, P., Bovin, N. V., Blixt, O., White, J. R., & Schnaar, R. L. (2005). Glycan Array Screening Reveals a Candidate Ligand for Siglec-8*. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m412378200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.