The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Target Selectivity of Vertebrate Notch Proteins
Open accessAbstract
All four mammalian Notch proteins interact with a single DNA-binding protein (RBP-jkappa), yet they are not equivalent in activating target genes. Parallel assays of three Notch-responsive promoters in several cell lines revealed that relative activation strength is dependent on protein module and promoter context more than the cellular context. Each Notch protein reads binding site orientation and distribution on the promoter differently; Notch1 performs extremely well on paired sites, and Notch3 prefers single sites in conjunction with a proximal zinc finger transcription factor. Although head-head sites can elicit a Notch response on their own, use of CBS (CSL binding site) in tail-tail orientation is context-dependent. Bias for specific DNA elements is achieved by interplay between the N-terminal RAM (RBP-jkappa-associated molecule/ankyrin region), which interprets CBS proximity and orientation, and the C-terminal transactivation domain that interacts specifically with the transcription machinery or nearby factors. To confirm the prediction that modular design underscores the evolution of functional divergence between Notch proteins, we generated a synthetic Notch protein (Notch1 ankyrin with Notch3 transactivation domain) that displayed superior signaling strength on the hes5 promoter. Consistent with the prediction that "preferred" targets (Hes1) should respond faster and at lower Notch concentration than other targets, we showed that Hes5-GFP was extinguished fast and recovered slowly, whereas Hes1-GFP was inhibited late and recovered quickly after a pulse of DAPT in metanephroi cultures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex
Bray, S. J. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2009 · Cited by 2,620
Notch signaling: simplicity in design, versatility in function
Andersson, E. R., Sandberg, R., & Lendahl, U. (2011) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.063610 · Cited by 950
c-Myc is an important direct target of Notch1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma
Weng, A. P., Millholland, J. M., Yashiro-Ohtani, Y., Arcangeli, M. L., Lau, A., Wai, C., del Bianco, C., Rodriguez, C. G., Sai, H., Tobias, J., et al. (2006) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1450406 · Cited by 870
Notch signaling mediates hypoxia-induced tumor cell migration and invasion
Sahlgren, C., Gustafsson, M. V., Jin, S., Poellinger, L., & Lendahl, U. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0802047105 · Cited by 823
Hilton, M. J., Tu, X., Wu, X., Bai, S., Zhao, H., Kobayashi, T., Kronenberg, H. M., Teitelbaum, S. L., Ross, F. P., Kopan, R., et al. (2008) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1716 · Cited by 604
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ong, C.-T., Cheng, H.-T., Chang, L.-W., Ohtsuka, T., Kageyama, R., Stormo, G. D., & Kopan, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 281
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5106-5119
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129828870
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Target Selectivity of Vertebrate Notch Proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m506108200
- The paper
- Ong, C.-T., Cheng, H.-T., Chang, L.-W., Ohtsuka, T., Kageyama, R., Stormo, G. D., & Kopan, R. (2006). Target Selectivity of Vertebrate Notch Proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m506108200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.