Cited by 26Malaria Research and ControlBlood groups and transfusionProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Structural Basis for the Adherence of Plasmodium falciparum-infected Erythrocytes to Chondroitin 4-Sulfate and Design of Novel Photoactivable Reagents for the Identification of Parasite Adhesive Proteins

Open access

Abstract

A dodecasaccharide motif of the low-sulfated chondroitin 4-sulfate (C4S) mediate the binding of Plasmodium falciparum-infected red blood cells (IRBCs) in human placenta. Here we studied the detailed C4S structural requirements by assessing the ability of chemically modified C4S to inhibit IRBC binding to the placental chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan. Replacement of the N-acetyl groups with bulky N-acyl or N-benzoyl substituents had no effect on the inhibitory activity of C4S, whereas reduction of the carboxyl groups abrogated the activity. Dermatan sulfates showed approximately 50% inhibitory activity when compared with C4Ss with similar sulfate contents. These data demonstrate that the C4S carboxyl groups and their equatorial orientation but not the N-acetyl groups are critical for IRBC binding. Conjugation of bulky substituents to the reducing end N-acetylgalactosamine residues of C4S dodecasaccharide had no effect on its inhibitory activity. Based on these results, we prepared photoaffinity reagents for the identification of the parasite proteins involved in C4S binding. Cross-linking of the IRBCs with a radioiodinated photoactivable C4S dodecasaccharide labeled a approximately 22-kDa novel parasite protein, suggesting strongly for the first time that a low molecular weight IRBC surface protein rather than a 200-400-kDa PfEMP1 is involved in C4S binding. Conjugation of biotin to the C4S dodecasaccharide photoaffinity probe afforded a strategy for the isolation of the labeled protein by avidin affinity precipitation, facilitating efforts to identify the C4S-adherent IRBC protein(s). Our results also have broader implications for designing oligosaccharide-based photoaffinity probes for the identification of proteins involved in glycosaminoglycan-dependent attachment of microbes to hosts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m604741200

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study identified a ~22 KDa protein, but no protein within the PfEMP1 molecular weight range, as a ligand for CSA.

    “A recent study identified a ~ 22 KDa protein, but no protein within the PfEMP1 molecular weight range, as a ligand for CSA (Gowda et al. , 2007).”

    From Towards a vaccine against pregnancy-associated malaria (2008) · cites this paper as Gowda et al., 2007

    The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that a C4S photoaffinity probe labeled a ~22-kDa parasite protein rather than a protein in the 200–400-kDa PfEMP1 range. But the photoaffinity-labeling section says the protein may either bind C4S directly or be part of an adhesive complex; calling it an identified ligand overstates that result. The Discussion also does not exclude PfEMP1 from such a complex. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 51 · Cited by 26

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Pasloske, 1994, Annu. Rev. Med., 45, 283, 10.1146/annurev.med.45.1.283 · DOI
  2. Weatherall, 2002, Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program, 35, 10.1182/asheducation-2002.1.35 · DOI
  3. Sherman, 2003, Microbes Infect., 5, 897, 10.1016/S1286-4579(03)00162-X · DOI
  4. Mackintosh, 2004, Trends Parasitol., 20, 597, 10.1016/j.pt.2004.09.006 · DOI
  5. Cooke, 2000, Parasitol. Today, 16, 416, 10.1016/S0169-4758(00)01753-1 · DOI
  6. Heddini, 2001, Infect. Immun., 69, 5849, 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5849-5856.2001 · DOI
  7. McGregor, 1983, Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 77, 232, 10.1016/0035-9203(83)90081-0 · DOI
  8. Menendez, 2000, J. Infect. Dis., 181, 1740, 10.1086/315449 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Beeson, 2005, Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol., 297, 187
  10. Rogerson, 1997, Parasitol. Today, 13, 70, 10.1016/S0169-4758(96)10081-8 · DOI
  11. Gowda, 1999, Biosci. Rep., 19, 261, 10.1023/A:1020542206916 · DOI
  12. Achur, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 40344, 10.1074/jbc.M006398200 · DOI
  13. Muthusamy, 2004, Am. J. Pathol., 164, 2013, 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63761-3 · DOI
  14. Alkhalil, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 40357, 10.1074/jbc.M006399200 · DOI
  15. Achur, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 11705, 10.1074/jbc.M211015200 · DOI
  16. Fried, 2000, Exp. Parasitol., 95, 75, 10.1006/expr.2000.4510 · DOI
  17. Chai, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 22438, 10.1074/jbc.M111401200 · DOI
  18. Rowe, 2004, Mol. Microbiol., 53, 1011, 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04256.x · DOI
  19. Baruch, 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 93, 3497, 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3497 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gardner, 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 93, 3503, 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3503 · DOI
  21. Gamain, 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 10020, 10.1073/pnas.152321599 · DOI
  22. Recker, 2004, Nature, 429, 555, 10.1038/nature02486 · DOI
  23. Bull, 2005, J. Infect. Dis., 192, 1119, 10.1086/432761 · DOI
  24. Buffet, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 12743, 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12743 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Reeder, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 5198, 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5198 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Salanti, 2003, Mol. Microbiol., 49, 179, 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03570.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. Salanti, 2004, J. Exp. Med., 200, 1197, 10.1084/jem.20041579 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Gamain, 2005, J. Infect. Dis., 191, 1010, 10.1086/428137 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Tuikue Ndam, 2005, J. Infect. Dis., 192, 331, 10.1086/430933 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Barfod, 2006, Infect. Immun., 74, 4357, 10.1128/IAI.01617-05 · DOI
  31. Muthusamy, 2004, Glycobiology, 14, 635, 10.1093/glycob/cwh077 · DOI
  32. Shaklee, 1984, Biochem. J., 217, 187, 10.1042/bj2170187 · DOI
  33. Finne, 1982, Methods Enzymol., 83, 269, 10.1016/0076-6879(82)83020-6 · DOI
  34. Cifonelli, 1976, Methods Carbohydr. Chem., 8, 139
  35. Taylor, 1976, Methods Carbohydr. Chem., 8, 149
  36. Jaseja, 1989, Can. J. Chem., 67, 1449, 10.1139/v89-221 · DOI
  37. Sugahara, 1994, Carbohydr. Res., 255, 145, 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)90976-5 · DOI
  38. Cowman, 1984, Biochem. J., 221, 707, 10.1042/bj2210707 · DOI
  39. Jackson, 1990, Biochem. J., 270, 705, 10.1042/bj2700705 · DOI
  40. Oonuki, 2005, Anal. Biochem., 343, 212, 10.1016/j.ab.2005.05.039 · DOI
  41. Romaniouk, 2004, Glycobiology, 14, 301, 10.1093/glycob/cwh044 · DOI
  42. Matsubayashi, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 15520, 10.1074/jbc.275.20.15520 · DOI
  43. Fuzesi, 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 18291, 10.1074/jbc.M500080200 · DOI
  44. Ridley, 1997, Anal. Biochem., 249, 10, 10.1006/abio.1997.2165 · DOI
  45. Elliott, 2005, Infect. Immun., 73, 2848, 10.1128/IAI.73.5.2848-2856.2005 · DOI
  46. Trang, 2004, Malaria J., 3, 1, 10.1186/1475-2875-3-7 · DOI
  47. Howard, 1984, J. Cell. Biochem., 24, 297, 10.1002/jcb.240240310 · DOI
  48. Leech, 1984, J. Exp. Med., 159, 1567, 10.1084/jem.159.6.1567 · DOI
  49. Laemmli, 1970, Nature, 227, 680, 10.1038/227680a0 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Rostand, 1997, Infect. Immun., 65, 1, 10.1128/IAI.65.1.1-8.1997 · DOI
  51. Wadström, 1999, J. Med. Microbiol., 48, 223, 10.1099/00222615-48-3-223 · DOI
  52. Carruthers, 2000, Infect. Immun., 125, 21

Metadata

Authors
Gowda, A. S. P., Madhunapantula, S. V., Achur, R. N., Valiyaveettil, M., Bhavanandan, V. P., & Gowda, D. C.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gowda, A.S. Prakasha
  • Gowda, D. Channe
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
282
Issue
2
Pages
916-928
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009869791
Cited by
26
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AI45086)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI45086)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood groups and transfusion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
Keywords
Plasmodium falciparum, infected erythrocytes, chondroitin 4-sulfate, placental adhesions, photoaffinity probes, carboxyl group orientation, N-acetyl group, dermatan sulfate, N-acetylgalactosamine, biotinylation, PfEMP1, placenta
MeSH terms
Acetylation, Acetylgalactosamine, Animals, Cell Adhesion, Chondroitin Sulfates, Erythrocytes, Female, Glucuronates, Humans, Nitrosourea Compounds, Placenta, Plasmodium falciparum, Pregnancy, Protein Binding, Protozoan Proteins, Malaria, Falciparum, Photoaffinity Labels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review