The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
“It’s like, ‘I’ve never met a lesbian before!’”: Personal narratives and the construction of diverse female identities in a lesbian counterpublic
Open accessAbstract
This paper uses membership categorization analysis to illustrate how five women invoke multiple female gender and sexuality identity categories in personal narratives to construct the device of womanhood. The five racially diverse women include four self-identified lesbians and one heterosexual and range in age from mid-twenties to early forties. Analysis of their two hour audio recorded interaction illustrates that gender and sexuality cannot be understood as a binary difference between men and women. These women use revolutionary categories, defined on their own terms rather than by outsiders, to characterize women they encounter in their personal experience (lesbian and otherwise). The revolutionary categories exemplify a diversity of female gender and sexuality identities and ultimately challenge heteronormative conceptions of female identity while simultaneously constructing a lesbian counterpublic. Thus, the personal experiences of these women, as related through everyday narratives, turn out to be highly political.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- Adams, 2005, Tomboys, dykes, and girly girls: Interrogating the subjectivities of adolescent female athletes, Women’s Studies Quarterly, 33, 17
- 10.1075/sin.1 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0047404504334020 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01379.x · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/ami027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0193723599234003 · DOI
- 10.1177/0891243205278639 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.12.005 · DOI
- Dori-Hacohen, 2013, “Rush, I love you”: Interactional fandom on American political talk-radio, International Journal of Communication, 7, 2697
- 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0957926502013006759 · DOI
- 10.1057/9780230246942_2 · DOI
- 10.1075/prag.17.3.01fer · DOI
- Giddens, 1984, The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration
- 10.1177/1461445612452229 · DOI
- Halberstam, 1998, Female masculinity
- Henley, 2008, Gender, power, and miscommunication, 133
- 10.1075/prag.17.1.05hig · DOI
- Hill, 1995, The voices of Don Gabriel: Responsibility and self in a modern Mexicano narrative, 97
- Hymes, 1962, The ethnography of speaking, 13
- 10.1007/s10508-005-9016-0 · DOI
- Jefferson, 1991, List construction as a task and resource, 63
- 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1525/jlin.2001.11.2.250 · DOI
- 10.1177/0959353500010002001 · DOI
- 10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.477 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_2 · DOI
- 10.1525/eth.1998.26.4.410 · DOI
- Labov, 1967, Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience, 12
- 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3804_1 · DOI
- 10.1177/0959353507076549 · DOI
- Lazar, 2008, Language, communication and the public sphere: A perspective from feminist critical discourse analysis, 89, 10.1515/9783110198980.1.89 · DOI
- 10.1177/0957926504041019 · DOI
- 10.1080/01463378709369678 · DOI
- Ochs, 1992, Indexing Gender, 335
- Ochs, 2004, Narrative lessons, 269
- Philipsen, 1992, Speaking culturally: Explorations in social communication
- Sacks, 1974, On the analyzability of stories by children, 216
- Sacks, 1979, Hotrodder: A revolutionary category
- 10.1353/lan.1977.0041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511611841 · DOI
- 10.1177/0959353503013003006 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511781032 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461445612441534 · DOI
- Sutton, 1995, Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang, 279
- 10.1515/9783110871968.311 · DOI
- 10.1177/0959353599009003012 · DOI
- 10.1177/0957926509106413 · DOI
- Wilkinson, 2003, Constructing identities: A feminist conversation analytic approach to positioning in action, 157, 10.5040/9798216187646.ch-010 · DOI
- 10.1075/prag.17.1.02zim · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jones, L. (2025) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12676 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Shrikant, N.
- Corresponding author
- Shrikant, Natasha
- ORCID
- Shrikant, Natasha
- Venue
- Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2022-07-06
- Pages
- 799-818
- ISSN
- 1018-2101 (ISSN-L)
- 2406-4238
- OpenAlex
- W2118367021
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Keywords
- lesbian identity, female gender identity, womanhood, heteronormativity, personal narrative, women's conversation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review