Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 872

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revised formulas for summarizing retinal vessel diameters

Knudtson, Michael D., Lee, Kristine E., Hubbard, Larry D., Wong, Tien Yin, Klein, Ronald, Klein, Barbara E.K.·2003·Current Eye Research

Abstract

Background/Purpose. Recent findings suggest that an objective assessment of retinal vessel caliber from fundus photographs provide information about the association of microvascular characteristics with macrovascular disease. Current methods used to quantify retinal vessel caliber, introduced by Parr(1,2) and Hubbard,(3) are not independent of scale and are affected by the number of vessels. To improve upon these methods we introduce revised formulas for quantifying vessel caliber. Methods. Revised formulas were estimated using retinal vessel measurements from 44 young adults free of hypertension and diabetes. Comparisons between the two methods were done using digitized photographs from 4926 participants at the baseline examination of the Beaver Dam Eye Study (BDES), an ongoing population-based cohort study initiated in 1987. Individual arterioles and venules were measured using semi-automated computer software from which summary measures were calculated. Results. Correlation coefficients between the Parr-Hubbard and revised formulas were high (Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.94 to 0.98). Both arteriolar and venular caliber significantly increased with an increasing number of vessels measured using the Parr-Hubbard formulas (p < 0.001), which in turn affected the relationship to mean arterial blood pressure. To the contrary, the revised formulas were not affected by the number of measured vessels (p > 0.50). Conclusions. We describe revised formulas for summarizing retinal vessel diameters measured from fundus photographs to be used in future studies and analyses. The revised formulas correlate highly with the previously used Parr-Hubbard formulas, but offer the advantages of being more robust against variability in the number of vessels observed, being independent of image scale, and being easier to implement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1076/ceyr.27.3.143.16049

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 872

Metadata

Authors
Knudtson, M. D., Lee, K. E., Hubbard, L. D., Wong, T. Y., Klein, R., & Klein, B. E. K.
Venue
Current Eye Research
Published
2003-01
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
143-149
ISSN
  • 0271-3683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2202
OpenAlex
W2141460031
Cited by
872
References
1
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised formulas for summarizing retinal vessel diameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1076/ceyr.27.3.143.16049
The paper
Knudtson, M. D., Lee, K. E., Hubbard, L. D., Wong, T. Y., Klein, R., & Klein, B. E. K. (2003). Revised formulas for summarizing retinal vessel diameters. Current Eye Research. https://doi.org/10.1076/ceyr.27.3.143.16049

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.