The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Participative and Stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and Modeling Processes
Abstract
The general shift towards a polycentric understanding of policy making requires the involvement of stakeholders as active participants into the policy process at different levels of societal organization. This is particularly true for water resource management where the traditional approach to solving environmental problems with technological fixes and end-of-pipe solutions has started to shift towards a more thoughtful attitude. This involves the development of integrated approaches to problem solving and to include stakeholder perspectives. This tendency receives strong support by the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) that emphasizes an integrated approach to water resources management at basin scale. The WFD requires the inclusion of stakeholders in the process of developing and adopting a river basin management plan. In order to improve stakeholder-based policy design and modeling processes innovation and research is required in linking analytical methods and participatory approaches. Factual knowledge and analytical techniques have to be combined with local knowledge and subjective perceptions of the various stakeholder groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hardin, G. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · Cited by 25,167
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Ostrom, E. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 18,859
Science for the post-normal age
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993) · Futures · doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-l · Cited by 4,255
The voice of the people: public opinion and democracy
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4782 · Cited by 1,239
Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation
(1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8 · Cited by 798
Glicken, J. (2000) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/s1462-9011(00)00105-2 · Cited by 269
Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead
Rotmans, J. (1998) · Environmental Modeling & Assessment · doi:10.1023/a:1019019024003 · Cited by 255
Marchi, B. D., Funtowicz, S. O., Cascio, S. L., & Munda, G. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00162-2 · Cited by 200
The dynamic nature of ecosystems: chaos and order entwined
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2119 · Cited by 199
Technological deliberation in a democratic society: the case for participatory inquiry
Fischer, F. (1999) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.3152/147154399781782293 · Cited by 88
Cited by
Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability
Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008 · Cited by 5,282
Social Learning and Water Resources Management
Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., & Taillieu, T. (2007) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02037-120205 · Cited by 1,314
Self-citationProcesses of social learning in integrated resources management
Pahl‐Wostl, C., & Hare, M. (2004) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.774 · Cited by 608
Self-citationPahl-Wostl, C. (2002) · Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1007/pl00012594 · Cited by 444
Self-citationStauffacher, M., Flüeler, T., Krütli, P., & Scholz, R. W. (2008) · Systemic Practice and Action Research · doi:10.1007/s11213-008-9107-7 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Pahl-Wostl, C.
- Venue
- Integrated Assessment
- Publisher
- Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 1389-5176 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975710207
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 11.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Participative and Stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and Modeling Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1076/iaij.3.1.3.7409
- The paper
- Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002). Participative and Stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and Modeling Processes. Integrated Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1076/iaij.3.1.3.7409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.