Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Learning and Water Resources Management

Open access
Pahl-Wostl, Claudia, Craps, Marc, Dewulf, Art, Mostert, Erik, Tabara, David, Taillieu, Tharsi·2007·Ecology and Society

Abstract

Natural resources management in general, and water resources management in particular, are currently undergoing a major paradigm shift.Management practices have largely been developed and implemented by experts using technical means based on designing systems that can be predicted and controlled.In recent years, stakeholder involvement has gained increasing importance.Collaborative governance is considered to be more appropriate for integrated and adaptive management regimes needed to cope with the complexity of social-ecological systems.The paper presents a concept for social learning and collaborative governance developed in the European project HarmoniCOP (Harmonizing COllaborative Planning).The concept is rooted in the more interpretive strands of the social sciences emphasizing the context dependence of knowledge.The role of frames and boundary management in processes of learning at different levels and time scales is investigated.The foundation of social learning as investigated in the HarmoniCOP project is multiparty collaboration processes that are perceived to be the nuclei of learning processes.Such processes take place in networks or "communities of practice" and are influenced by the governance structure in which they are embedded.Requirements for social learning include institutional settings that guarantee some degree of stability and certainty without being rigid and inflexible.Our analyses, which are based on conceptual considerations and empirical insights, suggest that the development of such institutional settings involves continued processes of social learning.In these processes, stakeholders at different scales are connected in flexible networks that allow them to develop the capacity and trust they need to collaborate in a wide range of formal and informal relationships ranging from formal legal structures and contracts to informal, voluntary agreements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5751/es-02037-120205

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,314

Metadata

Authors
Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., & Taillieu, T.
Venue
Ecology and Society
Published
2007
Volume
12
Issue
2
ISSN
1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1572817382
Cited by
1,314
References
2
FWCI
36.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Learning and Water Resources Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5751/es-02037-120205
The paper
Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., & Taillieu, T. (2007). Social Learning and Water Resources Management. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-02037-120205

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.