The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants: effect of exogenous nucleic acid supply on purine derivative excretion by sheep
Open accessAbstract
The present study examined the relationship between the supply of exogenous nucleic acid (NA) purines and their recovery as the derivatives hypoxanthine, xanthine, uric acid and allantoin in urine. Six lambs, totally nourished by intragastric infusions of volatile fatty acids (VFA) and casein (i.e. no rumen fermentation), were given by abomasal infusion a microbial NA concentrate at six levels (from zero to 24·5 mmol purines/d). The true digestibility between the abomasum and terminal ileum of the NA purines was measured in a separate experiment using three lambs. The relative proportion of urinary allantoin increased, and that of other derivatives decreased, as the amount of NA infused was increased. The relationship between total excretion of purine derivatives (Y;mmol/d) and exogenous purines absorbed (X;mmol/d) was Y= 0·84 X+ 0.150W 0·75e-0.25X, where W is body-weight (kg). This implies that the endogenous contribution to the total excretion of derivative decreased as the supply of exogenous purines increased, with an associated progressive replacement of de novo synthesis by exogenous purines. The model also implies that 0·16 of the purines were eliminated through routes other than derivative excretion in urine. Once excretion exceeded 0·6 mmol/kg W 0·75 per d, endogenous excretion was effectively zero and thus Y= 0·84 X.In normally fed sheep, derivative excretion should therefore relate to the microbial purines and, hence, microbial protein absorbed according to these models. The changing proportions of allantoin and other derivatives in urine were probably due to changes in the relative importance of endogenous and exogenous purines as precursors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Storm, E., & Ørskov, E. R. (1983) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19830114 · Cited by 229
Self-citation
Cited by
Verbic, J., Chen, X. B., MacLeod, N. A., & Ørskov, E. R. (1990) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859600072610 · Cited by 373
Self-citationInvited Review: Nitrogen in Ruminant Nutrition: A Review of Measurement Techniques
Hristov, A. N., Bannink, A., Crompton, L. A., Huhtanen, P., Kreuzer, M., McGee, M., Nozière, P., Reynolds, C. K., Bayat, A. R., Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R., et al. (2019) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2018-15829 · Cited by 283
Newbold, C. J., Wallace, R. J., Chen, X. B., & McIntosh, F. M. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7361811x · Cited by 273
Self-citationDewhurst, R. J., Mitton, A. M., Offer, N. W., & Thomas, C. (1996) · Animal Science · doi:10.1017/s1357729800014272 · Cited by 63
Chen, X. B., Hovell, F. D. D., & ØRskov, E. R. (1990) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19900107 · Cited by 47
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, X. B., Hovell, F. D. D., Ørskov, E. R., & Brown, D. S.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-142
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2021951718
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants: effect of exogenous nucleic acid supply on purine derivative excretion by sheep. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn19900098
- The paper
- Chen, X. B., Hovell, F. D. D., Ørskov, E. R., & Brown, D. S. (1990). Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants: effect of exogenous nucleic acid supply on purine derivative excretion by sheep. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19900098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.