The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relationship between in vitro gas production,in vitro microbial biomass yield and15N incorporation and its implications for the prediction of voluntary feed intake of roughages
Open accessAbstract
The relationship between in vitro gas production, concomitant in vitro apparent and true DM degradability has been examined in forty-two roughages. The partitioning of truly-degraded substrate between gas volume and microbial biomass yield and 15 N incorporation into cells was also investigated. The relevance of this partitioning for the regulation of DM intake (DMI) was examined for fifty-four roughages. The results can be summarized as follows.In vitro gas production and in vitro apparent and true degradability are highly correlated (P<0.0001),r being 0.96 and 0.95 respectively. There is an inverse relationship between in vitro gas production and microbial biomass yield (r—0.67, (P<0.0001) and also 15 N enrichment (P<0.001)when the variables were related to a given unit of substrate truly degraded. Selecting roughages by in vitro gas production may well be a selection against maximum microbial yield and a combination of in vitro gas volume measurements with a complementary determination of the substrate truly degraded is proposed, to calculate a partitioning factor (PF) reflecting the variation of short-chain fatty acid production per unit substrate degraded. PF is calculated as the ratio, substrate truly degraded: gas produced by it. PF was highly significant (P<0.0001) in DMI prediction when included in stepwise multiple correlations together with in vitro gas volume variables reflecting the extent and rate of gas production; 11 % of the variation in DMI was accounted for by the PF. The total model, including extent and rate of gas production and the PF, accounted for 84 % of the variation in DMI. Roughages producing proportionally less gas per unit substrate truly degraded had higher feed intakes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant
Van Soest, P. J. (1994) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9781501732355 · Cited by 7,312
A theoretical study on the amount of ATP required for synthesis of microbial cell material
Stouthamer, A. H. (1973) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/bf02578899 · Cited by 588
Blu¨mmel, M., & Ørskov, E. R. (1993) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/0377-8401(93)90150-i · Cited by 553
A Theoretical Rumen Fermentation Balance
Wolin, M. J. (1960) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(60)90348-9 · Cited by 478
France, J., Dhanoa, M. S., Theodorou, M. K., Lister, S. J., Davies, D. R., & Isac, D. (1993) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.1993.1109 · Cited by 425
THE STATUS OF YATP AND MAINTENANCE ENERGY AS BIOLOGICALLY INTERPRETABLE PHENOMENA
Tempest, D. W., & Neijssel, O. M. (1984) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.38.100184.002331 · Cited by 305
Blümmel, M., & Becker, K. (1997) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19970073 · Cited by 216
Self-citationEfficiency of Rumen Microbial Growth: Influence of some Theoretical and Experimental Factors on YATP
Hespell, R. B., & Bryant, M. P. (1979) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas1979.4961640x · Cited by 210
Modeling gas production kinetics of grass silages incubated with buffered ruminal fluid1
Beuvink, J. M. W., & Kogut, J. (1993) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1993.7141041x · Cited by 119
Quantitative ruminant nutrition — a green science
Leng, R. A. (1993) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar9930363 · Cited by 103
Cited by
Patra, A. K., & Yu, Z. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00309-12 · Cited by 416
Goel, G., Makkar, H. P. S., & Becker, K. (2008) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.010 · Cited by 189
Self-citationContreras-Govea, F. E., Muck, R. E., Mertens, D. R., & Weimer, P. J. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.09.015 · Cited by 161
Lactobacillus plantarum effects on silage fermentation and in vitro microbial yield
Contreras-Govea, F. E., Muck, R. E., Broderick, G. A., & Weimer, P. J. (2013) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.11.008 · Cited by 87
Amer, S., Hassanat, F., Berthiaume, R., Seguin, P., & Mustafa, A. F. (2012) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.024 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Blümmel, M., Steingaβ, H., & Becker, K.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 911-921
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2125020329
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 11.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between in vitro gas production,in vitro microbial biomass yield and15N incorporation and its implications for the prediction of voluntary feed intake of roughages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn19970089
- The paper
- Blümmel, M., Steingaβ, H., & Becker, K. (1997). The relationship between in vitro gas production,in vitro microbial biomass yield and15N incorporation and its implications for the prediction of voluntary feed intake of roughages. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19970089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.