The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of fat replacement by inulin or lupin-kernel fibre on sausage patty acceptability, post-meal perceptions of satiety and food intake in men
Open accessAbstract
The present study examined whether replacing fat with inulin or lupin-kernel fibre influenced palatability, perceptions of satiety, and food intake in thirty-three healthy men (mean age 52 years, BMI 27·4kg/m 2), using a within-subject design. On separate occasions, after fasting overnight, the participants consumed a breakfast consisting primarily of either a full-fat sausage patty (FFP) or a reduced-fat patty containing inulin (INP) or lupin-kernel fibre (LKP). Breakfast variants were alike in mass, protein and carbohydrate content; however the INP and LKP breakfasts were 36 and 37% lower in fat and 15 and 17% lower in energy density respectively compared with the FFP breakfast. The participants rated their satiety before breakfast then evaluated patty acceptability. Satiety was rated immediately after consuming the breakfast, then over the subsequent 4·5h whilst fasting. Food consumed until the end of the following day was recorded. All patties were rated above ‘neither acceptable or unacceptable’, however the INP rated lower for general acceptability (P=0·039) and the LKP lower for flavour (P=0·023) than the FFP. The LKP breakfast rated more satiating than the INP (P=0·010) and FFP (P=0·016) breakfasts. Total fat intake was 18g lower on the day of the INP (P=0·035) and 26g lower on the day of the LKP breakfast (P=0·013) than the FFP breakfast day. Energy intake was lower (1521kJ) only on the day of the INP breakfast (P=0·039). Both inulin and lupin-kernel fibre appear to have potential as fat replacers in meat products and for reducing fat and energy intake in men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications
Wolever, T., Jenkins, D., Jenkins, A., & Josse, R. (1991) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/54.5.846 · Cited by 1,168
Dietary fat intake does affect obesity!
Bray, G. A., & Popkin, B. M. (1998) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/68.6.1157 · Cited by 1,123
Astrup, A., Grunwald, G., Melanson, E., Saris, W., & Hill, J. (2000) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801453 · Cited by 468
Cited by
Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism
Morrison, D. J., & Preston, T. (2016) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2015.1134082 · Cited by 3,781
The role of the gut microbiota in energy metabolism and metabolic disease
Cani, P., & Delzenne, N. (2009) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/138161209788168164 · Cited by 974
The role of short chain fatty acids in appetite regulation and energy homeostasis
Byrne, C. S., Chambers, E. S., Morrison, D. J., & Frost, G. (2015) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2015.84 · Cited by 707
The gut microbiota, obesity and insulin resistance
Shen, J., Obin, M. S., & Zhao, L. (2013) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2012.11.001 · Cited by 599
Diabetes, obesity and gut microbiota
Everard, A., & Cani, P. D. (2013) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2013.03.007 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Archer, B. J., Johnson, S. K., Devereux, H. M., & Baxter, A. L.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 591-599
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2109174466
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of fat replacement by inulin or lupin-kernel fibre on sausage patty acceptability, post-meal perceptions of satiety and food intake in men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn20031088
- The paper
- Archer, B. J., Johnson, S. K., Devereux, H. M., & Baxter, A. L. (2004). Effect of fat replacement by inulin or lupin-kernel fibre on sausage patty acceptability, post-meal perceptions of satiety and food intake in men. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn20031088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.