Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Markers to measure immunomodulation in human nutrition intervention studies

Open access
Albers, Ruud, Antoine, Jean-Michel, Bourdet-Sicard, Raphaëlle, Calder, Philip C., Gleeson, Michael, Lesourd, Bruno, Samartín, Sonia, Sanderson, Ian R., Van Loo, Jan, Vas Dias, F. Willem, Watzl, Bernhard·2005·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Normal functioning of the immune system is crucial to the health of man, and diet is one of the major exogenous factors modulating individual immunocompetence. Recently, nutrition research has focused on the role of foods or specific food components in enhancing immune system responsiveness to challenges and thereby improving health and reducing disease risks. Assessing diet-induced changes of immune function, however, requires a thorough methodological approach targeting a large spectrum of immune system parameters. Currently, no single marker is available to predict the outcome of a dietary intervention on the resistance to infection or to other immune system-related diseases. The present review summarises the immune function assays commonly used as markers in human intervention studies and evaluates their biological relevance (e.g. known correlation with clinically relevant endpoints), sensitivity (e.g. within- and between-subject variation), and practical feasibility. Based on these criteria markers were classified into three categories with high, medium or low suitability. Vaccine-specific serum antibody production, delayed-type hypersensitivity response, vaccine-specific or total secretory IgA in saliva and the response to attenuated pathogens, were classified as markers with high suitability. Markers with medium suitability include natural killer cell cytotoxicity, oxidative burst of phagocytes, lymphocyte proliferation and the cytokine pattern produced by activated immune cells. Since no single marker allows conclusions to be drawn about the modulation of the whole immune system, except for the clinical outcome of infection itself, combining markers with high and medium suitability is currently the best approach to measure immunomodulation in human nutrition intervention studies. It would be valuable to include several immune markers in addition to clinical outcome in future clinical trials in this area, as there is too little evidence that correlates markers with global health improvement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn20051469

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Albers, R., Antoine, J.-M., Bourdet-Sicard, R., Calder, P. C., Gleeson, M., Lesourd, B., Samartín, S., Sanderson, I. R., Van Loo, J., Vas Dias, F. W., & Watzl, B.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2005-09
Volume
94
Issue
3
Pages
452-481
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2107681355
Cited by
286
References
8
FWCI
13.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Markers to measure immunomodulation in human nutrition intervention studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn20051469
The paper
Albers, R., Antoine, J.-M., Bourdet-Sicard, R., Calder, P. C., Gleeson, M., Lesourd, B., Samartín, S., Sanderson, I. R., Van Loo, J., Vas Dias, F. W., & Watzl, B. (2005). Markers to measure immunomodulation in human nutrition intervention studies. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn20051469

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.