The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early Stage Animal Hoarders: Are These Owners of Large Numbers of Adequately Cared for Cats?
Abstract
Animal hoarding is a spectrum-based condition in which hoarders are often reported to have had normal and appropriate pet-keeping habits in childhood and early adulthood. Historically, research has focused largely on well-established clinical animal hoarders with little work targeted towards the onset and development of animal hoarding. This study investigated whether a Brazilian population of owners of what might typically be considered an excessive number (20 or more) of cats were more likely to share the commonly reported psychological and demographic profile of animal hoarders than owners of 1-2 cats drawn from the same population. Psychological traits measured were attachment to pets (Lexington Pet Attachment Scale, LAPS), anxiety and depression (Hospitalized Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), and hoarding behavior (Saving Inventory-Revised, SI-R). Owners of 20 or more cats were significantly older, scored significantly higher pet attachment scores, and displayed significant positive relationships between hoarding behavior and anxiety. Such a profile demonstrates greater similarities to clinical animal hoarders than to typical cat owners on these particular measures, although additional disparities with clinical animal hoarders exist in the areas of functioning, veterinary care and home organization. Taking this information together, the studied population may represent the understudied group of early stage animal hoarders. However, external factors such as culture and societal animal control policies should not be overlooked as alternative explanations for pet keeping at levels that might be considered excessive.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There are also owners keeping larger numbers of animals that are superficially comparable to clinical animal hoarding cases, but animal and human welfare are not really compromised [102].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [102]
In the citing paper
“They found that people who owned many cats were more similar to clinical animal hoarders in age and pet attachment levels than the typical cat owners, but they differed in functioning, veterinary care and home organization.”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [102]
Citations
Cites
A cognitive-behavioral model of compulsive hoarding
Frost, R. O., & Hartl, T. L. (1996) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(95)00071-2 · Cited by 853
Hoarding: a community health problem
Frost, R. O., Steketee, G., & Williams, L. (2000) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2524.2000.00245.x · Cited by 399
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.02.003 · DOI
- Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E. & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ:
- ARCA Brasil (Associação Humanitária de Proteção e Bem-Estar Animal). Estatísticas sobre cães e gatos em São Paulo. ARCA Brasil, http://www.arcabrasil.org.br/animais/caes_e_gatos/estatistica.htm; 2008 (accessed July, 2008).
- ARCA Brasil (Associação Humanitária de Proteção e Bem-Estar Animal). Especial: superlotação e abandono. ARCA Brasil, http://www.arcabrasil.org.br/noticias/1104_adocao.html, 2011 (accessed April, 2011).
- 10.2752/089279305785594333 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279308X274056 · DOI · Paper page
- Botega, N. J., Bio, M. R., Zomignani, M. A., Garcia Jr., C., Pereira, W. A. B. (1995). Transtornos de humor em enfermarias de clínica médica e validação de escala de medida (HAD) de ansiedade e depressão. Saúde Pública 29, 355-363.
- Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss. New York: Basic Books.
- 10.1163/156853001300108973 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2752/089279302786992676 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.015 · DOI
- 10.2752/175303710X12627079939143 · DOI
- 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90094-B · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/10673229909000339 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/da.20826 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279390787057829 · DOI
- HARC (Hoarding of Animal Research Consortium) (2000). People who hoard animals. Psychiatric Times, 17, 25-29.
- 10.1093/hsw/27.2.125 · DOI
- Jeffreys, D. & Moore, K. A. (2008). Pathological hoarding. Australian Family Physician, 37, 237-241.
- 10.1177/019394502320555377 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2752/089279392787011395 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781452232959.n7 · DOI
- Lockwood, R. (1994). The psychology of animal collectors. Trends, 9, 18-21.
- Lockwood, R. & Cassidy, B. (1988). Killing with kindness? Humane Society News (Summer), 14-18.
- 10.2752/175303711X12998632257585 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/08946560903004839 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/phr/114.1.81 · DOI · Paper page
- Patronek, G. J. (2006). Animal hoarding: it’s roots and recognition. Veterinary Medicine. http://veterinarymedicine.dvm360.com/vet med?Medicine?ArticlesStandard/Article/detail/364367 31st January 2012.
- Patronek, G. J. & HARC (2001). The problem of animal hoarding. Municipal Lawyer, 42, 6-9.
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Podberscek, A., Blackshaw, J. K. & Bodero, D. A. V. (1988). An evaluation of human-cat associations. Australian Veterinary Practitioner, 18, 16-20.
- Pongracz, P.; Miklosi, A.; Csanyi, V. (2001). Owner’s beliefs on the ability of their pet dogs to understand human verbal communication: a case of social understanding. Current Psychology of Cognition. 20 (1-2), 87-107;
- 10.1017/S1041610206004236 · DOI
- Soares, I. D. (2007). Colecionismo patológico: avaliação clínica e psicométrica. 118 f. Tese (Doutorado em Psicologia) - Instituto de Psicologia da Universiadade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
- 10.2752/089279394787002087 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279399787000237 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0023484 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2752/089279304785643230 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279303786992143 · DOI
- Worth, D. & Beck, A. M. (1981). Multiple ownership of animals in New York City. Transactions and Studies of the Colleges of Physicians of Philadelphia, 3, 280-300.
- 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramos, D., da Cruz, N. O., Ellis, S. L. H., Hernandez, J. A. E., & Reche-Junior, A.
- Affiliations
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87 CEP 05508 270, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, Brasil(Corresponding author)
- Venue
- Human-animal interaction bulletin
- Publisher
- CABI Publishing
- Published
- 2013-12-01
- ISSN
- 2333-522X
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review