Cited by 64Human-Animal Interaction StudiesUrban Green Space and HealthAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Older Latinos, Pets, and Health

Johnson, Rebecca A., Meadows, Richard L.·2002·Western Journal of Nursing Research

Abstract

The majority of the findings regarding pet ownership, interaction, and the human-animal bond have involved only Caucasians or have included other ethnic group members only incidentally. The extent to which older adults from other ethnic groups may benefit from pet ownership and interaction is unclear. If the benefits of human-animal interaction are to be used effectively in promoting health and preventing illness, it is necessary to identify the “boundaries” of effectiveness for this interaction across various populations. The present study is an initial effort at describing one ethnic minority group, Latino pet owners, the extent of their relationships with their pet, and the extent to which these relationships maybe beneficial in facilitating health. Twenty-four Latinos over age 50 were studied and are described in terms of their demographic characteristics, relationships with their pets, health, and exercise practices. The findings suggest that the participants were very devoted to their pets, had been involved with pets since child-hood, and viewed themselves as healthy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/019394502320555377

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seventy-five percent of elderly Latino pet owners deemed their health "excellent".

    “Two-thirds considered the dogs to be their “best friends” and “reason for getting up in the morning” and their health to be better “than most people,” and seventy-five percent deemed their health “excellent.””
  • In one study, elderly Latino pet owners, mean age 66, responded to a survey of their attitudes toward their dogs and health.

    “In one study, elderly Latino pet owners, mean age 66, responded to a survey of their attitudes toward their dogs and health [64].”
  • Two-thirds of elderly Latino pet owners considered the dogs to be their "best friends" and "reason for getting up in the morning".

    “Two-thirds considered the dogs to be their “best friends” and “reason for getting up in the morning” and their health to be better “than most people,” and seventy-five percent deemed their health “excellent.””
  • Two-thirds of elderly Latino pet owners considered their health to be better "than most people".

    “Two-thirds considered the dogs to be their “best friends” and “reason for getting up in the morning” and their health to be better “than most people,” and seventy-five percent deemed their health “excellent.””

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1992.tb137178.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1136/vr.117.25-26.659 · DOI
  3. 10.1300/J052v15n03_02 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Friedmann, E., 1980, Public Health Reports, 95, 307
  5. 10.2752/089279390787057829 · DOI
  6. Gelfand, D., 1994, Ethnicity and aging
  7. Gibson, R., 1990, Generations, 35
  8. 10.1177/0013164491512010 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/01939450022044746 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/01945902024004009 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.2752/089279392787011476 · DOI
  12. 10.2752/089279390787057793 · DOI
  13. 10.2752/089279388787058308 · DOI
  14. McDowell, D., 1994, Long-term care in health care reform, 186
  15. 10.1093/geront/30.2.243 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1081 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.2190/DQUW-XAE9-8CYH-F04J · DOI
  18. 10.2466/pr0.1998.82.1.191 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0882-7974.10.1.3 · DOI
  20. U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1992, Population estimates, by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin: 1980 to 1991
  21. 10.2752/089279388787058650 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/geronj/45.3.S95 · DOI
  23. 10.2466/pr0.1994.75.2.747 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, R. A., & Meadows, R. L.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Western Journal of Nursing Research
Published
2002-10
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
609-620
ISSN
  • 0193-9459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8456
OpenAlex
W2062954932
Cited by
64
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Western Journal of Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
Latino older adults, pet ownership, human-animal bond, human-animal interaction, health promotion, exercise practice, ethnic minority health, self-rated health
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Human-Animal Bond, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dogs, Ethnicity, Female, Health Status, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Missouri, Surveys and Questionnaires, Clinical Nursing Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review