The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature
Abstract
Growing interest in organic agriculture has prompted numerous studies that compare various aspects of organic and conventionally produced foods. This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of empirical studies comparing organic products and conventionally grown alternatives. The emphasis is on key organic consumer demand and marketing issues, including: (1) the implications of an economic definition of organically grown food for consumer demand; (2) attributes that shoppers consider most when comparing organic with conventionally grown products; (3) level and characteristics of consumer knowledge and awareness about organic food; (4) assessment methods and characteristics of organic consumer attitudes and preferences; (5) size of price premium and characteristics of consumers’ willingness-to-pay for organic products; and (6) profile of organic consumers. Overall, although there is some knowledge and awareness about organic products, consumers are not consistent in their interpretation of what is organic. Secondly, while consumers typically understand the broad issues about organic foods, many tend not to understand the complexities and niceties of organic farming practices and organic food quality attributes. Uncertainty regarding the true attributes of organic, and skepticism about organic labels, part of which stems from reported cases of (inadvertent) mislabeling, and product misrepresentation, and partly because of nonuniform organic standards and certification procedures, may hold some consumers back from purchasing organic. Thirdly, concern for human health and safety, which is a key factor that influences consumer preference for organic food, is consistent with observed deterioration in human health over time and, therefore, motivates consumers to buy organic food as insurance and/or investment in health. Fourthly, the proportion of consumers who are willing to pay a price premium for organic food decreases with premium level. On the other hand, premiums tend to increase with (combinations of) preferred attributes. In addition, demand tends to depend more on the price differential with respect to conventionally grown products, than on actual price. In contrast to sensitivity of demand to changes in price, income elasticity of demand for organic foods is generally small. Finally, it is important for policy analysts and researchers to note that organic fresh fruits and vegetables currently dominate the organic consumer's food basket. Furthermore, it is not clear whether frequent buyers consider particular organic products (e.g., organic meat) as normal goods, or if consumers consider such products as luxury goods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health
Grossman, M. (1972) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259880 · Cited by 5,951
Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud
Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466756 · Cited by 3,947 · cited 1×
“This notion of a good leads logically to a perspective by economists —first developed by Nelson 16 and Darby and Karni 17 — namely, credence characteristics.”
Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods
Grunert, S. C., & Juhl, H. J. (1995) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/0167-4870(94)00034-8 · Cited by 766
Cited by
Barański, M., Średnicka-Tober, D., Volakakis, N., Seal, C., Sanderson, R., Stewart, G. B., Benbrook, C., Biavati, B., Markellou, E., Giotis, C., et al. (2014) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114514001366 · Cited by 684
Consumers’ Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare
Alonso, M. E., González-Montaña, J. R., & Lomillos, J. M. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10030385 · Cited by 538
Linking green skepticism to green purchase behavior
Goh, S. K., & Balaji, M. S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.122 · Cited by 474
Ahmed, N., Li, C., Khan, A., Qalati, S. A., Naz, S., & Rana, F. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2020.1785404 · Cited by 393
Decisional factors driving organic food consumption: Generation of consumer purchase intentions
Teng, C.-C., & Wang, Y.-M. (2015) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-12-2013-0361 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Yiridoe, E. K., Bonti-Ankomah, S., & Martin, R. C.
- Venue
- Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 193-205
- ISSN
- 0889-1893 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-1705
- 1742-1713
- OpenAlex
- W2109853336
- Cited by
- 753
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/raf2005113
- The paper
- Yiridoe, E. K., Bonti-Ankomah, S., & Martin, R. C. (2005). Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. https://doi.org/10.1079/raf2005113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.