Cited by 474Environmental Sustainability in BusinessEnvironmental Education and SustainabilitySustainable Supply Chain Management

Linking green skepticism to green purchase behavior

Goh, See Kwong, Balaji, M.S.·2016·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.122

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goh, S. K., & Balaji, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Taylor's University (MY)
  • University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
Corresponding author
Balaji, M.S.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
131
Pages
629-638
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2378301674
Cited by
474
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
FWCI
38.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
green skepticism, green purchase behavior, green purchase intention, environmental concern, environmental knowledge, green products, environmental disclosure, consumer attitudes, Malaysia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review