The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice: A Roundtable Discussion
Abstract
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods make possible the use of flexible Bayesian models that would otherwise be computationally infeasible. In recent years, a great variety of such applications have been described in the literature. Applied statisticians who are new to these methods may have several questions and concerns, however: How much effort and expertise are needed to design and use a Markov chain sampler? How much confidence can one have in the answers that MCMC produces? How does the use of MCMC affect the rest of the model-building process? At the Joint Statistical Meetings in August, 1996, a panel of experienced MCMC users discussed these and other issues, as well as various “tricks of the trade” This article is an edited recreation of that discussion. Its purpose is to offer advice and guidance to novice users of MCMC—and to not-so-novice users as well. Topics include building confidence in simulation results, methods for speeding and assessing convergence, estimating standard errors, identification of models for which good MCMC algorithms exist, and the current state of software development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Self-citationMonte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
Practical markov chain monte carlo
Geyer, C. J. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011137 · Cited by 2,045
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Analysis Using Population Modeling and Informative Prior Distributions
Gelman, A., Bois, F., & Jiang, J. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476708 · Cited by 353
Self-citation
Cited by
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation
King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2669316 · Cited by 3,232
Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation
King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401000235 · Cited by 1,834
Denwood, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v071.i09 · Cited by 731
First‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe(WMAP) Observations: Parameter Estimation Methodology
Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Spergel, D. N., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Limon, M., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377335 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Kass, R. E., Carlin, B. P., Gelman, A., & Neal, R. M.
- Venue
- The American Statistician
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-100
- ISSN
- 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2731
- OpenAlex
- W1996977322
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice: A Roundtable Discussion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00031305.1998.10480547
- The paper
- Kass, R. E., Carlin, B. P., Gelman, A., & Neal, R. M. (1998). Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice: A Roundtable Discussion. The American Statistician. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1998.10480547
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.