Cited by 83Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

A cross-disciplinary introduction to quantum annealing-based algorithms

Open access
Venegas-Andraca, Salvador E., Cruz-Santos, William, McGeoch, Catherine, Lanzagorta, Marco·2018·Contemporary Physics

Abstract

A central goal in quantum computing is the development of quantum hardware and quantum algorithms in order to analyse challenging scientific and engineering problems. Research in quantum computation involves contributions from both physics and computer science; hence this article presents a concise introduction to basic concepts from both fields that are used in annealing-based quantum computation, an alternative to the more familiar quantum gate model. We introduce some concepts from computer science required to define difficult computational problems and to realise the potential relevance of quantum algorithms to find novel solutions to those problems. We introduce the structure of quantum annealing-based algorithms as well as two examples of this kind of algorithms for solving instances of the max-SAT and Minimum Multicut problems. An overview of the quantum annealing systems manufactured by D-Wave Systems is also presented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00107514.2018.1450720

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [4][4] Wong B, Mittal A, Cao Y, Starr GW. Nano-CMOS Circuit and Physical Design. 1st ed.: Hoboken (NJ):Wiley & Sons; 2005. -
  2. [10][10] Wittek P. Quantum Machine Learning. Academic Press (2014) -
  3. [25][25] MIT Tech Review 10 Breakthrough Technologies 2017 - Practical Quantum Computers. -
  4. [31][31] Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. -
  5. [33][33] Savage JE. Models of Computation. Addison-Wesley Publishers; 1998. -
  6. [36][36] Guenin B, K¨ onemann J, Tun¸ cel L. A Gentle Introduction to Optimization. Cambridge University Press;2015. -
  7. [38][38] Papadimitriou CH. Computational complexity. Addison-Wesley; 1995. -
  8. [40][40] Goldreich O. P, NP, and NP-completeness. Cambridge University Press; 2011. -
  9. [43][43] Deutsch D. Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 1985;400(1818):97-117. -
  10. [44][44] Strassen V. Gaussian Elimination is not Optimal, Numer. Math. 1969;13:354-356. -
  11. [45][45] Hedtke I. Strassen's Matrix Multiplication Algorithm for Matrices of Arbitrary Order. Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2011; 3(2):269-277. -
  12. [52][52] Levin L. Universal search problems. Problems of Information Transmission (in Russian) 1973;9(3):115-116. -
  13. [53][53] Henderson D, Jacobson SH and Alan W. Johnson. Handbook of Metaheuristics. Boston:Springer; 2003. Chapter 10, The Theory and Practice of Simulated Annealing: 287-319. -
  14. [56][56] Bapst V, Semerjian G. Thermal, quantum and simulated quantum annealing: analytical comparisons for simple models. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 2011;473:1-8 (012011). -
  15. [57][57] Martoˇ n´ ak R, Santoro GE, Tosatti E. Phys. Rev. E 2004;58: 057701. -
  16. [60][60] Sornborger AT. Substituting a Qubit for an Arbitrarily Large Number of Classical Bits. Sci. Rep. 2012;2:597. -
  17. [67][67] Dickson NG, et al. Thermally assisted quantum annealing of a 16-qubit problem. Nature Communications 2013;4:1903. -
  18. [71][71] McGeoch CC, Wang C. Experimental evaluation of an adiabatic quantum system for combinatorial optimization. Proc. 2013 Conf. on Computing Frontiers, ACM; 2013. -
  19. [74][74] Venturelli D, Marchand DJJ, Roho G. Quantum annealing implementation of Job-Shop Scheduling. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling; 2016. -
  20. [76][76] Kaminsky WM, Lloyd S, Orlando TP. Scalable superconducting architecture for adiabatic quantum computation. arXiv.org:quant-ph/0403090, 2004. - · arXiv
  21. [85][85] Boros E, Gruber A. On Quadratization of Pseudo-Boolean Functions. International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics 2014. -
  22. [89][89] King J. et al., Benchmarking a quantum annealing processor with the time-to-target metric. arXiv:1508.05087v1. 2015. - · arXiv
  23. [90][90] King J. et al., Quantum annealing amid local ruggedness and global frustration. arXiv:1701.04579v2. 2017. - · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Venegas-Andraca, S. E., Cruz-Santos, W., McGeoch, C., & Lanzagorta, M.
Affiliations
  • Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
  • Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (MX)
  • D-Wave Systems (Canada) (CA)
  • United States Naval Research Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Venegas-Andraca, Salvador E.
Venue
Contemporary Physics
Published
2018-04-03
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
174-197
ISSN
  • 0010-7514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5812
OpenAlex
W2792255093
Cited by
83
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (1007, 41594)
  • CONACyT (1007, 41594)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum annealing, MaxSAT, combinatorial optimization, quantum computing hardware, computational complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review