Cited by 173Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesComplexity and Algorithms in GraphsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Energy Minimization via Graph Cuts: Settling What is Possible

Freedman, D., Drineas, P.·2005·2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05)

Abstract

The recent explosion of interest in graph cut methods in computer vision naturally spawns the question: what energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts? This question was first attacked by two papers of Kolmogorov and Zabih, in which they dealt with functions with pair-wise and triplewise pixel interactions. In this work, we extend their results in two directions. First, we examine the case of k-wise pixel interactions; the results are derived from a purely algebraic approach. Second, we discuss the applicability of provably approximate algorithms. Both of these developments should help researchers best understand what can and cannot be achieved when designing graph cut based algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2005.143

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potentially large overhead in the number of variables lead to the development of several methods for degree reduction.

    “The potentially large overhead in the number of variables lead to the development of several methods for degree reduction (e.g., References [160, 167, 168, 180, 188])”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freedman, D., & Drineas, P.
Affiliations
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Venue
2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2005-07-27
Volume
2
Pages
939-946
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135165032
Cited by
173
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
graph cuts, energy minimization, pairwise interactions, approximate algorithms, image segmentation, algebraic characterization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review