The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spontaneous parametric down-conversion
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Spontaneous parametric down conversion is the easiest way of preparing Bell states”
From Transformation of Bell states using linear optics (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
Experimental quantum teleportation
Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Mattle, K., Eibl, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37539 · Cited by 5,545 · cited 2×
“orescence was used for the demonstration of quantum teleportation [13], quantum cryptography [14], ControlNot (CNOT) gates [15], quantum candela [16] or for quantum lithography [17].”
BackgroundMethodMeasurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 · Cited by 3,894
New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs
Kwiat, P. G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., Sergienko, A. V., & Shih, Y. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4337 · Cited by 3,102
Experimental one-way quantum computing
Walther, P., Resch, K. J., Rudolph, T., Schenck, E., Weinfurter, H., Vedral, V., Aspelmeyer, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03347 · Cited by 1,273
O'Brien, J. L. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1142892 · Cited by 1,221 · cited 2×
“Since then, this process is at the heart of many quantum optics experiments for applications in quantum cryptography [3], quantum computing [4], quantum metrology [5] but also simply for testing fundamentals laws of physics in quantum mechanics [6].”
BackgroundObservation of Simultaneity in Parametric Production of Optical Photon Pairs
Burnham, D. C., & Weinberg, D. L. (1970) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.25.84 · Cited by 1,111
Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C., & Branning, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02054 · Cited by 992
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1103/PhysRev.124.1646 · DOI
- 10.1080/09500340600769521 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1190545 · DOI
- 10.1119/1.1498859 · DOI
- 10.1119/1.1498860 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.2011 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.035801 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4729 · DOI
- 10.1364/OL.31.002441 · DOI
- Schubert M, 1986, Nonlinear optics and quantum electronics
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.2409 · DOI
- Loudon R., 2000, The quantum theory of light, 10.1093/oso/9780198501770.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1117/1.602464 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.023802 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.58 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3891 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphoton.2011.213 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2205 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4737 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/163 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.052339 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1345 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4435 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphys507 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphoton.2011.354 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.210502 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2012.259 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphoton.2013.102 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.4724105 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250401 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250402 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.053601 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2013.339 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.153605 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.183901 · DOI
- 10.1364/OPTICA.5.000608 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing
Couteau, C., Barz, S., Durt, T., Gerrits, T., Huwer, J., Prevedel, R., Rarity, J., Shields, A., & Weihs, G. (2023) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00583-2 · Cited by 216
Self-citationTransformation of Bell states using linear optics
Mishra, S., & Singh, R. P. (2024) · Physics Open · doi:10.1016/j.physo.2023.100199 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Couteau, C.
- Affiliations
- Light, Nanomaterials and Nanotechnologies (L2n, ex-LNIO) – Department of Physics, Materials, Mechanics and Nanotechnologies, University of Technology of Troyes, Troyes, France
- Venue
- Contemporary Physics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-07-03
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-304
- ISSN
- 0010-7514
- 1366-5812
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 14
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
