Cited by 100Global trade, sustainability, and social impactSustainable Supply Chain ManagementPolitical Economy and Marxism

Where Chain Governance and Environmental Governance Meet: Interfirm Strategies in the Canned Tuna Global Value Chain​

Open access
Havice, Elizabeth, Campling, Liam·2017·Economic Geography

Abstract

In value chain scholarship, chain governance is the relationship of power among firms in a production network. For economic geographers working on the environment, governance refers primarily to state- and nonstate-based institutional and regulatory arrangements shaping human–environment interactions. Yet the theoretical and empirical links between these two concepts of governance are opaque. Drawing on a longitudinal case study of the canned tuna value chain and a historic materialist method, we demonstrate how interfirm strategies over the appropriation of value and distribution of costs and risks work through the environment. We document moments of change in the value chain that enliven a dynamic understanding of how a lead firm becomes and reproduces its power, and strategies that subordinate firms deploy to try to counter the power of lead firms. We posit that these moves broaden value chain scholarship’s focus from governance typologies toward the gravitational tendencies of capitalist competition and that such tendencies are inextricable from the environmental conditions of production through which they are made possible. This approach enables us to look at value chains and the environmental conditions of production as mutually constitutive, helping to explain vexing modern environmental problems as a core element of the general tendencies, mechanisms, and drivers of power in chains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00130095.2017.1292848

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A relational form of network structure tends to favor inter-firm cooperation and credible commitment.

    “Such a relational form of network structure tends to favor inter-firm cooperation and credible commitment (e.g., IKEA and its suppliers in Ivarsson & Alvstam, 2011 and tuna canning firms in Havice & Campling, 2017).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Havice & Campling, 2017

  • Only two studies in the paper's sample (Brancati et al., 2017; Havice & Campling, 2017) examined temporal factors in a targeted manner.

    “Only two studies in our sample (Brancati et al., 2017;Havice & Campling, 2017) examined temporal factors in a targeted manner.”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Havice & Campling, 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Gellert, P.K., 2003. Renegotiating a Timber Commodity Chain: Lessons from Indonesia on the Political Construction of Global Commodity Chains. Sociological Forum 18 (1), 53-84.
  2. Hamby, J., 2009. The future of tuna -an indication based on recent investments, European Tuna Conference, Brussels.
  3. Havice, E., Campling, L., 2010. Shifting tides in the Western Central Pacific Ocean tuna fishery: The political economy of regulation and industry responses. Global Environmental Politics 10 (1), 89-114.
  4. ISSF, 2014a. Report of ISSF Capacity Transfer Workshop, Barcelona.
  5. Levy, D., Newell, P., 2005. The Business of Global Environmental Governance, Global Environmental Accord. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  6. Lischewski, C.D., 2006. The U.S. Market for Shelf Stable Tuna: An Update, in: Subasunghe, S., S. Pawiro and S.M. Anthonysamy (Ed.), Tuna 2006: 9th Infofish World Tuna Trade Conference and Exhibition. Infofish, Bangkok, pp. 132-140.
  7. McGowan, M., McClain, K., 2010. Global Tuna Demand Workshop: Market and Cannery Overview.
  8. Morón, J., 2002. The world tuna purse seine fishery and the WTPO, in: Subasinghe, S., Pawiro, S. (Eds.), Global Tuna Industry Situation and Outlook: Resources, Production & Marketing Treands and Technological Issues. INFOFISH, Kuala Lumpur.
  9. Subasinghe, S., Sudari, P. (Eds.), Tuna 2000 Bangkok: Papers of the 6th World Tuna Trade Conference. INFOFISH, Bangkok.
  10. World Bank, 2010. The Hidden Harvests: The Global Contribution of Capture Fisheries (conference edition).Washington, DC: World Bank

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Havice, E., & Campling, L.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Havice, Elizabeth
  • Campling, Liam
Venue
Economic Geography
Published
2017-03-21
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
292-313
ISSN
  • 0013-0095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8287
OpenAlex
W2603470109
Cited by
100
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5
FWCI
19.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economic Geography (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Southwest Regional Fisheries Division
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
Keywords
chain governance, environmental governance, global value chains, canned tuna, lead firms, power relations, value appropriation, capitalist competition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review