The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE MEASUREMENT OF SENSORY-MOTOR PERFORMANCE : SURVEY AND REAPPRAISAL OF TWELVE YEARS' PROGRESS
Abstract
In recent, years the importance of perceptual and central organizing activities in sensory-motor performance has been increasingly recognised and progress has been made towards a genuinely quantitative treatment. This paper sketches the historical development of the work in this area and attempts a reappraisal under five main heads : (a) There appears to be in the central mechanisms a ‘ single channel ’ which deals with signals or groups of signals one at a time so that signals coming in rapid succession may have to ‘ queue ’ before they are dealt with. (b) Choice reaction times are discussed in relation to the theory that the subject gains information, in the information-theory sense of the term, at a constant rate. Conceptual models of the subject's detailed behaviour when making choices are also considered. (c) Information theory models relating to the speed and accuracy of movement arc outlined and discussed. (d) Several formulae attempting to relate time taken to discriminate quantities of different magnitudes and the fineness of the difference between them are examined. (e) A number of wider implications of the work surveyed are outlined. Perhaps the most important of these are now approaches to ‘ mental ’ and monitoring tasks which have so far not been amenable to the normal methods of work study. It is concluded that there is a need for joint psychological and physiological research which would be able to go beyond descriptive mathematical formulae to the study of detailed micro-behaviour and neuro-muscular mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.
Hyman, R. (1953) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056940 · Cited by 1,443
Cited by
High-speed scanning in human memory
Sternberg, S. (1966) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.153.3736.652 · Cited by 3,576
The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method
Sternberg, S. (1969) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9 · Cited by 3,137
Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality
MOYER, R. S., & LANDAUER, T. K. (1967) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2151519a0 · Cited by 2,068
Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction
MacKenzie, I. S. (1992) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3 · Cited by 1,637
Information capacity of discrete motor responses.
Fitts, P. M., & Peterson, J. R. (1964) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045689 · Cited by 1,534
Metadata
- Authors
- WELFORD, A. T.
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1960-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 189-230
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2051533101
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.