The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some Aspects of the Selective Process in the Functional Visual Field
Abstract
A review is given of a group of experiments on performance as a function of display angle, aiming at a description of the perceptual strategies used with signals at various angular separations. The first experiments were carried out using a simple four-choice discrimination task. The results show a non-linear decrease of performance as a function of display angle, which proved to be related to the necessity of making eye and head movements when shifting from one signal source to the other. It is suggested that the non-linearity is due to changes of strategy and a preliminary theory about selective processes is formulated and tested in a number of tasks
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
Broadbent, D. E. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10037-000 · Cited by 4,337
The information available in brief visual presentations
Sperling, G. (1960) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093759 · Cited by 4,042
Cited by
Guided Search 6.0: an updated model of visual search
Wolfe, J. M. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9 · Cited by 703
Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view
Ball, K. K., Beard, B. L., Roenker, D. L., Miller, R. L., & Griggs, D. S. (1988) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.5.002210 · Cited by 601
Speed-of-Processing and Driving Simulator Training Result in Improved Driving Performance
Roenker, D. L., Cissell, G. M., Ball, K. K., Wadley, V. G., & Edwards, J. D. (2003) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.45.2.218.27241 · Cited by 469
The useful field of view test: Normative data for older adults
EDWARDS, J., ROSS, L., WADLEY, V, CLAY, O., CROWE, M., ROENKER, D., & BALL, K. (2006) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.03.001 · Cited by 231
Phansalkar, S., Edworthy, J., Hellier, E., Seger, D. L., Schedlbauer, A., Avery, A. J., & Bates, D. W. (2010) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2010.005264 · Cited by 226
Are videogame training gains specific or general?
Oei, A. C., & Patterson, M. D. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00054 · Cited by 77
Normal blindness: when we look but fail to see
Wolfe, J. M., Kosovicheva, A., & Wolfe, B. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.006 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- SANDERS, A. F.
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1970-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-117
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2000743030
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
