Cited by 53Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmbodied and Extended Cognition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unconscious perceptual justification*

Open access
Berger, Jacob, Nanay, Bence, Quilty-Dunn, Jake·2018·Inquiry

Abstract

Perceptual experiences justify beliefs. A perceptual experience of a dog justifies the belief that there is a dog present. But there is much evidence that perceptual states can occur without being conscious, as in experiments involving masked priming. Do unconscious perceptual states provide justification as well? The answer depends on one’s theory of justification. While most varieties of externalism seem compatible with unconscious perceptual justification, several theories have recently afforded to consciousness a special role in perceptual justification. We argue that such views face a dilemma: either consciousness should be understood in functionalist terms, in which case our best current theories of consciousness do not seem to imbue consciousness with any special epistemic features, or it should not, in which case it is mysterious why only conscious states are justificatory. We conclude that unconscious perceptual justification is quite plausible.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0020174x.2018.1432413

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 10.5840/philtopics198614118 · DOI
  2. Armstrong D. M., 1968, A Materialist Theory of the Mind
  3. Baars B. J., 1988, A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness
  4. Baddeley A. D., 1986, Working Memory
  5. 10.1080/05568649209506374 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/phc3.v9.6 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/978-94-007-6001-1 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/analys/anw060 · DOI
  9. Block N., 2007, Consciousness, Function, and Representation: Collected Papers, Volume 1, 10.7551/mitpress/2111.001.0001 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/phpr.12258 · DOI
  11. Bonjour L., 1985, The Structure of Empirical Knowledge
  12. Brandom R., 1994, Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, & Discursive Commitment
  13. 10.1111/phpr.2003.67.issue-3 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s11098-015-0537-7 · DOI
  15. Chalmers D. J., 1996, The Conscious Mind. in Search of a Fundamental Theory
  16. Chalmers D. J., 2003, Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, 220, 10.1093/oso/9780199241286.003.0009 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s11098-010-9495-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1515/9783110325843.51 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Dennett D. C., 1991, Consciousness Explained
  21. 10.1007/s11098-008-9225-1 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/BF00372404 · DOI
  23. Feldman R., 2001, American Philosophical Quarterly, 38, 1
  24. 10.1007/978-94-009-9493-5_1 · DOI
  25. 10.5840/jphil2009106611 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/17588928.2011.565121 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hameroff S. R., 1994, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1, 91
  28. 10.1111/j.1533-6077.2011.00200.x · DOI
  29. 10.2307/2960077 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Jeannerod M., 1997, The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action
  31. Kentridge R. W., 2011, Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, 228
  32. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.012 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2093 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570355.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Lehrer K., 1990, Theory of Knowledge
  36. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006 · DOI
  37. Lycan W. G., 1996, Consciousness and Experience
  38. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195373578.001.0001 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/phis.12073 · DOI
  40. Mack A., 1998, Inattentional Blindness, 10.7551/mitpress/3707.001.0001 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/0020174X.2014.858417 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/336766a0 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Milner A. D., 1995, The Visual Brain in Action
  44. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190633776.001.0001 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/s11098-014-0293-0 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/analys/anp165 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/phpr.2016.93.issue-2 · DOI
  48. 10.1073/pnas.91.16.7398 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1006/ccog.2000.0442 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195314595.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1111/0029-4624.00277 · DOI
  52. Quilty-Dunn J., Unconscious Perception and Phenomenal Coherence
  53. Rosenthal D. M., 2005, Consciousness and Mind, 10.1093/oso/9780198236979.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Shea N., 2016, Neuroscience of Consciousness, 1, 1
  55. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198797081.001.0001 · DOI
  56. Siegel S., 2015, The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Perception, 781
  57. Siegel S., Attention and Perceptual Justification
  58. 10.1093/mind/fzr030 · DOI
  59. Silins N., 2014, Scepticism and Perceptual Justification, 149
  60. 10.5840/jphil201110811 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/mila.2011.26.issue-2 · DOI
  62. 10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.738 · DOI
  63. Talbott W. J., 1990, The Reliability of the Cognitive Mechanism
  64. 10.1007/s11229-016-1233-7 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/nrn.2016.44 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1111/phpe.2011.24.issue-1 · DOI
  67. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899494.001.0001 · DOI
  68. Weiskrantz L., 2009, Blindsight: A Case Study Spanning 35 Years and New Developments, 10.1093/oso/9780199567218.001.0001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 53

Metadata

Authors
Berger, J., Nanay, B., & Quilty-Dunn, J.
Affiliations
  • Idaho State University (US)
  • Centre for Philosophical Psychology, University of Antwerp , Antwerp, Belgium
  • Philosophy, University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
Corresponding author
Berger, Jacob
Venue
Inquiry
Published
2018-02-22
Volume
61
Issue
5-6
Pages
569-589
ISSN
  • 0020-174X (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-3923
OpenAlex
W2791923583
Cited by
53
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Inquiry (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G0C7416N, Odysseus G.0020.12N)
  • H2020 European Research Council (726251)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
unconscious perception, perceptual justification, epistemic justification, externalism, functionalism, theory of consciousness, masked priming, epistemology of perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review