Cited by 1,172Visual perception and processing mechanismsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Why visual attention and awareness are different

Lamme, Victor A.F.·2003·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Now that the study of consciousness is warmly embraced by cognitive scientists, much confusion seems to arise between the concepts of visual attention and visual awareness. Often, visual awareness is equated to what is in the focus of attention. There are, however, two sets of arguments to separate attention from awareness: a psychological/theoretical one and a neurobiological one. By combining these arguments I present definitions of visual attention and awareness that clearly distinguish between the two, yet explain why attention and awareness are so intricately related. In fact, there seems more overlap between mechanisms of memory and awareness than between those of attention and awareness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00013-x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When people are unaware of a visual stimulus, they can still sometimes direct attention to it.

    “When people are unaware of a visual stimulus, they can still sometimes focus processing resources on it. They can direct attention to it (McCormick, 1997; Lamme, 2003; Woodman and Luck, 2003; Ansorge and Heumann, 2006; Tsushima et al., 2006; Kentridge et al., 2008; Hsieh et al., 2011; Norman et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lamme, V. A. F.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Lamme, Victor A.F.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
12-18
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156281732
Cited by
1,172
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 50
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
visual attention, visual awareness, consciousness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review