Cited by 162Quality and Supply ManagementManagement and Optimization TechniquesDigital Transformation in Industry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Applying Value Stream Mapping to eliminate waste: a case study of an original equipment manufacturer for the automotive industry

Open access
Lacerda, António Pedro, Xambre, Ana Raquel, Alvelos, Helena Maria·2016·International Journal of Production Research

Abstract

Since its beginning, lean manufacturing has built a worldwide reputation based on results related to production improvement and cost reduction in several companies. This management philosophy focuses on customer value creation through the elimination of production wastes. Lean methods and techniques have spread their scope from the automotive industry to a wide range of industries and services. This article presents a case study that describes the use of the lean tool value stream mapping in the production process of automotive parts for a major automotive company. At the beginning of the project, relevant data from the process were collected and analysed. Subsequently, the initial process was mapped, the related wastes were identified, and then future processes were mapped and financial results were estimated. The proposals were presented on kaizen meetings, the action plan was discussed and the decision regarding which option to choose was taken. Consequently, the Cycle Time and the level of the workforce were reduced, the process was improved and savings were obtained.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207543.2015.1055349

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Duggan Kevin J., 2013, Creating Mixed Model Value Streams: Practical Lean Techniques for Building to Demand
  2. Krafcik John, 1988, Sloan Management Review, 30, 41
  3. Surekha S., 2013, International Journal of Management Research and Business Strategy, 2, 62

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Lacerda, A. P., Xambre, A. R., & Alvelos, H. M.
Affiliations
University of Aveiro (PT)
Corresponding author
Xambre, Ana Raquel
Venue
International Journal of Production Research
Published
2015-06-18
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
1708-1720
ISSN
  • 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-588X
OpenAlex
W1536549742
Cited by
162
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5
FWCI
26.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Production Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • CIDMA – Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications
  • Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
Keywords
value stream mapping, lean manufacturing, waste elimination, automotive parts manufacturing, original equipment manufacturers, Kaizen, cycle time reduction, layoffs, production process improvement, cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review