Cited by 566Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

Using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS‐21) across cultures

Open access
Oei, Tian P. S., Sawang, Sukanlaya, Goh, Yong Wah, Mukhtar, Firdaus·2013·International Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The DASS-21 is a well-established instrument for measuring depression, anxiety, and stress with good reliability and validity reported from Hispanic American, British, and Australian adults. However, the lack of appropriate validation among Asian populations continues to pose concerns over the use of DASS-21 in Asian samples. Cultural variation may influence the individual's experience and emotional expression. Thus, when researchers and practitioners employ Western-based assessments with Asian populations by directly translating them without an appropriate validation, the process can be challenging. We conducted a series of rigorous statistical tests and minimized any potential confounds from the demographic information. Following factor analyses, we performed multigroup analysis across six nations to demonstrate consistency of our findings. The advantages of this revised DASS-18 stress scale are twofold. First, it possesses fewer items, which results in a cleaner factorial structure. Second, it has a smaller interfactor correlation. With these justifications, the revised DASS-18 stress scale is potentially more suitable for Asian populations. Nonetheless, given limitations, findings should be considered preliminary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207594.2012.755535

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oei, T. P. S., Sawang, S., Goh, Y. W., & Mukhtar, F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • University of Southern Queensland (AU)
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Sawang, Sukanlaya
Venue
International Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
1018-1029
ISSN
  • 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-066X
OpenAlex
W1990781714
Cited by
566
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7
FWCI
14.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
DASS-21, depression, anxiety, stress, cross-cultural validation, Asian populations, factor structure, psychometric properties
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Asia, Australia, Culture, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress, Psychological, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review