Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

New Media Interactive Advertising vs. Traditional Advertising

Bezjian-Avery, Alexa, Calder, Bobby, Iacobucci, Dawn·1998·Journal of Advertising Research

Abstract

This research explores the effectiveness of interactive advertising on a new medium platform. Like the presence in industry and the media themselves, the academic research stream is fairly new. Our research seeks to isolate the key feature of interactivity from confounding factors and to begin to tease apart those situations for which interactivity might be highly desirable from those situations for which traditional advertising vehicles may be sufficient or superior.We find that the traditional linear advertising format of conventional ads is actually better than interactive advertising for certain kinds of consumers and for certain kinds of ads. In particular, we find that a cognitive “matching” of the system properties (being predominately visual or verbal} and the consumer segment needs (preferring their information to be presented in a visual or verbal manner) appears to be critical.More research should be conducted before substantial expenditures are devoted to advertising on these interactive media. These new means of communicating with customers are indeed exciting, but they must be demonstrated to be effective on consumer engagement and persuasion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00218499.1998.12466563

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Berthon, Pierre, Leyland Pitt, and Richard Watson. “The World Wide Web as an Advertising Medium: Toward an Understanding of Conversion Efficiency.” journal of Advertising Research 36, 1 (1996): 43–54.
  2. Blatiberg, Robert, and John Deighton. “Interactive Marketing: Exploiting the Age of Addressibility.” Sloan Management Review 32, 1 (1991): 5–14.
  3. 10.1086/208501 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1177/002224299606000304 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Schank Roger. Dynamic Memory. New York: Cambridge University Press 1982.

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Bezjian-Avery, A., Calder, B., & Iacobucci, D.
Venue
Journal of Advertising Research
Published
1998-07
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
23-32
ISSN
  • 0021-8499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1909
OpenAlex
W188361862
Cited by
466
References
0
FWCI
32.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Media Interactive Advertising vs. Traditional Advertising. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00218499.1998.12466563
The paper
Bezjian-Avery, A., Calder, B., & Iacobucci, D. (1998). New Media Interactive Advertising vs. Traditional Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218499.1998.12466563

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.