Cited by 1,142Augmented Reality ApplicationsConsumer Retail Behavior StudiesDigital Marketing and Social Media

Is Augmented Reality Technology an Effective Tool for E-commerce? An Interactivity and Vividness Perspective

Yim, Mark Yi-Cheon, Chu, Shu-Chuan, Sauer, Paul L.·2017·Journal of Interactive Marketing

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of augmented reality (AR) as an e-commerce tool using two products — sunglasses and watches. Study 1 explores the effectiveness of AR by comparing it to a conventional website. The results show that AR provides effective communication benefits by generating greater novelty, immersion, enjoyment, and usefulness, resulting in positive attitudes toward medium and purchase intention, compared to the web-based product presentations. Study 2 compares the paths by which consumers evaluate products through AR versus web with a focus on interactivity and vividness. It is revealed that immersion mediates the relationship between interactivity/vividness and two outcome variables — usefulness and enjoyment in the AR condition compared to the web condition where no significant paths between interactivity and immersion and between previous media experience and media novelty are found. Participants’ subjective opinions about AR are examined through opinion mining to better understand consumer responses to AR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intmar.2017.04.001

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relative to static online displays, AR raises product attitudes, purchase intention, and willingness to pay, with gains large enough to register in real sales data.

    “A substantial body of work confirms that, relative to static online displays, AR raises product attitudes, purchase intention, and willingness to pay, and that these gains are large enough to register in real sales data (Heller et al. 2019;Yim et al. 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yim, M. Y.-C., Chu, S.-C., & Sauer, P. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
  • DePaul University (US)
  • Canisius College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Yim, Mark Yi-Cheon
  • Chu, Shu-Chuan
  • Sauer, Paul L.
Venue
Journal of Interactive Marketing
Published
2017-08
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
89-103
ISSN
  • 1094-9968 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6653
OpenAlex
W2724987513
Cited by
1,142
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 169 · 2025: 234 · 2024: 215 · 2023: 161 · 2022: 141 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 1
FWCI
13.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interactive Marketing (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
augmented reality, e-commerce, interactivity, vividness, immersion, purchase intention, consumer attitudes, product presentation, sunglasses, watches, sentiment analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review