The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom
Abstract
Comparing math teaching in Japan and Germany with those in the United States, two leading researchers offer a surprising new view of teaching and a bold action plan for improving education inside the American classroom.For years our schools and children have lagged behind international standards in reading, arithmetic, and most other areas of academic achievement. It is no secret that American schools are in dire need of improvement, and that education has become our nation's number-one priority. But even though almost every state in the country is working to develop higher standards for what students should be learning, along with the means for assessing their progress, the quick-fix solutions implemented so far haven't had a noticeable impact.The problem, as James Stigler and James Hiebert explain, is that most efforts to improve education fail because they simply don't have any impact on the quality of teaching inside classrooms. Teaching, they argue, is cultural. American teachers aren't incompetent, but the methods they use are severely limited, and American teaching has no system in place for getting better. It is teaching, not teachers, that must be changed.In The Teaching Gap, the authors draw on the conclusions of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) -- an innovative new study of teaching in several cultures -- to refocus educational reform efforts. Using videotaped lessons from dozens of randomly selected eighth-grade classrooms in the United States, Japan, and Germany, the authors reveal the rich, yet unfulfilled promise of American teaching and document exactly how other countries have consistently stayed ahead of us in the rate their children learn. Our schools can be restructured as places where teachers can engage in career-long learning and classrooms can become laboratories for developing new, teaching-centered ideas. If provided the time they need during the school day for collaborative lesson study and plan building, teachers will change the way our students learn.James Stigler and James Hiebert have given us nothing less than a best practices for teachers -- one that offers proof that how teachers teach is far more important than increased spending, state-of-the-art facilities, mandatory homework, or special education -- and a plan for change that educators, teachers, and parents can implement together.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2 · Cited by 1,923
Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540600902875340 · Cited by 1,759
Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737024002081 · Cited by 1,688
Professional Noticing of Children's Mathematical Thinking
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169 · Cited by 1,433
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986060802229675 · Cited by 1,222
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Curriculum Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 867-874
- ISSN
- 0022-0272 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5839
- OpenAlex
- W1489358524
- Cited by
- 2,546
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 228.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00220270050167215
- The paper
- The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom. (2000). Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270050167215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.