The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change
Abstract
This paper examines how secondary teachers of the core subjects of English, mathematics, and science have begun to integrate information and communication technology (ICT) into mainstream classroom practice in English schools. It draws on an analysis of 18 focus‐group interviews with subject departments in these fields. Evident commitment to incorporating ICT was tempered by a cautious, critical approach, and by the influence of external constraints. Teacher accounts emphasized both the use of ICT to enhance and extend existing classroom practice, and change in terms of emerging forms of activity which complemented or modified practice. A gradual process of pedagogical evolution was apparent; teachers were developing and trialling new strategies specifically for mediating ICT‐supported learning. In particular, these overcame the potentially obstructive role of some forms of ICT by focusing pupils’ attention onto underlying learning objectives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
Teachers and ICT: Current use and future needs
Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., & Tuson, J. (2000) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00164 · Cited by 249
OP-ED Trojan horse or teacher's pet? computers and the culture of the school
Olson, J. (2000) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/002202700182817 · Cited by 72
Cited by
Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551 · Cited by 2,556
Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process
Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018) · Educational Media International · doi:10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712 · Cited by 528
Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J.-J. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.057 · Cited by 425
(2007) · Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London) · Cited by 346
Teacher adoption of technology
Aldunate, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.017 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- HENNESSY, S., RUTHVEN, K., & BRINDLEY, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Curriculum Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-192
- ISSN
- 0022-0272 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5839
- OpenAlex
- W2018738722
- Cited by
- 714
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 87.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0022027032000276961
- The paper
- HENNESSY, S., RUTHVEN, K., & BRINDLEY, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000276961
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.