Cited by 56Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Choice and PerformanceCritical Race Theory in Education

Increasing Teacher Expectations for Student Achievement

Gottfredson, Denise C., Marciniak, Elizabeth M., Birdseye, Ann T., Gottfredson, Gary D.·1995·The Journal of Educational Research

Abstract

This report summarizes a study of a staff development program to reduce disparity in educational achievement across race and sex. Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement (TESA; Kerman, Kimball, & Martin, 1980) was implemented in an elementary school. Achievement test scores, attitudes toward school and self, perceptions of teacher practices, and grade retentions were compared for the 306 students of teachers who volunteered to participate in the experimental program, as well as students in the same school (n = 329) and in a different school (n = 250) whose teachers did not participate. The results differed depending upon which comparison group was used. A small positive effect is implied by the within-school comparison, and a negative effect is implied by the between-school comparison.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00220671.1995.9941294

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two of the five TESA studies were fully experimental (S. C. Jones, 1990; Kohler, 1987), two were quasi-experimental and included a pre-test (Gottfredson et al., 1995; Warren, 1989), and Kerman (1979) was not described very well but seemed to be at least quasi-experimental and with a pre-test included.

    “Two of the fi ve TESA studies were fully experimental (S. C. Jones, 1990; Kohler, 1987), two were quasi-experimental and included a pre-test (Gottfredson et al., 1995; Warren, 1989), and the study of Kerman (1979) was not described very well, but seemed to be at least quasi-experimental and with a pre-test included.”
  • Gottfredson et al. (1995) found that the overall intervention effect on reading and math tests for students in Grades 1 to 5 was close to zero.

    “The overall picture of the outcomes on the various tests was that the intervention e ff ect was close to zero (some tests yielded small e ff ects in a positive, some in a negative direction).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gottfredson, D. C., Marciniak, E. M., Birdseye, A. T., & Gottfredson, G. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Educational Research
Published
1995-01
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
155-163
ISSN
  • 0022-0671 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0675
OpenAlex
W2007118889
Cited by
56
References
21
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
teacher expectations, academic performance, employee development, achievement gap, elementary school, achievement test scores, attitudes toward school, school retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review