Cited by 302Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Choice and PerformanceCognitive Abilities and Testing

Magnitude of teacher expectancy effects on pupil IQ as a function of the credibility of expectancy induction: A synthesis of findings from 18 experiments.

Raudenbush, Stephen W.·1984·Journal of Educational Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.85

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raudenbush, S. W.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Raudenbush, Stephen W.
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
1984-02
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
85-97
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W1981707533
Cited by
302
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
credibility, teacher expectations, self-fulfilling prophecy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review