The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Learning and Retrieval Rate of Words Presented Auditorily and Visually
Open accessAbstract
Mode of presentation (visual or auditory) of a multitrial free recall test is stressed as an important factor in improving the diagnosis of certain neurological patients. For further use in neuropsychological research, an experiment was carried out using normal subjects, in which the effects of presentation mode and order of modality were investigated. There were no differential effects of these variables on several parameters, such as the number of words recalled and the learning curve. The time needed for the responses in immediate recall was the same in both auditory and visual conditions. In delayed recall, however, the interresponse times were significantly shorter when words had been presented auditorily than when presented visually. The results are discussed in light of further application in the field of neuropsychology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Systemic markers of inflammation and cognitive decline in old age
Schram, M. T., Euser, S. M., De Craen, A. J. M., Witteman, J. C., Frölich, M., Hofman, A., Jolles, J., Breteler, M. M. B., & Westendorp, R. G. J. (2007) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01159.x · Cited by 326
Self-citationGut microbiome, big data and machine learning to promote precision medicine for cancer
Cammarota, G., Ianiro, G., Ahern, A., Carbone, C., Temko, A., Claesson, M. J., Gasbarrini, A., & Tortora, G. (2020) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-020-0327-3 · Cited by 324
Tisserand, D. J. (2004) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh057 · Cited by 271
Alterations in theory of mind in patients with schizophrenia and non‐psychotic relatives
Janssen, I., Krabbendam, L., Jolles, J., & Van Os, J. (2003) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00092.x · Cited by 263
Self-citationHomocysteine and cognitive function in the elderly: The Rotterdam Scan Study
Prins, N. D., den Heijer, T., Hofman, A., Koudstaal, P. J., Jolles, J., Clarke, R., & Breteler, M. M. B. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000032494.05619.93 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brand, N., & Jolles, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of General Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1985-04
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-210
- ISSN
- 0022-1309 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-0888
- OpenAlex
- W2163436138
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning and Retrieval Rate of Words Presented Auditorily and Visually. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00221309.1985.9711004
- The paper
- Brand, N., & Jolles, J. (1985). Learning and Retrieval Rate of Words Presented Auditorily and Visually. The Journal of General Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1985.9711004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
