Cited by 64Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementCOVID-19 and Mental HealthUrban Green Space and Health

Leisure Engagement during COVID-19 and Its Association with Mental Health and Wellbeing in U.S. Adults

Open access
Shen, Xiangyou, MacDonald, Megan, Logan, Samuel W., Parkinson, Colby, Gorrell, Lydia, Hatfield, Bridget E.·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Leisure engagement has risen as a salient societal issue during the COVID-19 pandemic, not only because it provides a pathway for people to continue meeting their physical, cognitive, and social-emotional needs, but also due to the phenomenal juxtaposition of general increases in leisure time and unparalleled constraints. This study reports the results of the first investigation of U.S. adults’ overall leisure engagement and its association with mental health amidst the major disruptions and sustained stress of the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through an online survey in February 2021 through Prolific from a sample representative of the U.S. adult population in age, gender, and race (n = 503) and analyzed using a mixed-method approach. A total of 104 unique leisure activities in 19 categories and 3 domains were identified through iterative thematic coding. Participants reported general increases in home-based traditional leisure and digital/online activities and decreases in physical and nature-based activities. Multiple regression analyses controlling for socio-demographic and context-specific covariates revealed distinct associations between changes in leisure engagement and different aspects of mental health (perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and mental wellbeing), supporting leisure’s dual role in facilitating stress alleviation and wellbeing enhancement during taxing events, such as COVID-19.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph19031081

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a link between carrying out activities with others frequently and better psychological wellbeing, rather than simply being engaged in leisure activities.

    “because there is a link between carrying out activities with others frequently and better psychological wellbeing, rather than simply being engaged in leisure activities.”

    From Social connections combat loneliness and promote wellbeing among college students coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic (2025) · cites this paper as Shen et al., 2022

    The Results (§3.3.3; page unavailable) report that overall leisure-activity frequency did not predict mental wellbeing, while activity type and participants’ evaluation of their engagement were associated with it. This supports the distinction from simply engaging in leisure, but the paper does not establish that frequently carrying out activities with others is linked to better wellbeing. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Disruptions in social interactions can have a negative impact on mental health.

    “Disruptions in social interactions can have a negative impact on mental health (Kim and Cho, 2020; Shen et al., 2022)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [81]Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd ed. Routledge Academic New York, NY, USA 1988

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, X., MacDonald, M., Logan, S. W., Parkinson, C., Gorrell, L., & Hatfield, B. E.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Shen, Xiangyou
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-01-19
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
1081
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206842443
Cited by
64
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 9
FWCI
14.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Hallie E. Ford Center for Healthy Children & Families (na)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
Keywords
leisure participation, COVID-19 pandemic, mental health, well-being, perceived stress, depressive symptoms, nature-based activities, physical activity, leisure
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Humans, Leisure Activities, Mental Health, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review