The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Free(z)ing Degrees of Freedom in Skill Acquisition
Abstract
This study reports an empirical investigation into Bernstein's (1967) ideas that in the early stages of the acquisition of a movement skill the coordination problem is reduced by an initial freezing out of degrees of freedom, followed later in the learning process by the release of these degrees of freedom and their incorporation into a dynamic, controllable system. “Freezing” degrees of freedom was made operational both as a rigid fixation of individual degrees of freedom and as the formation of rigid couplings between multiple degrees of freedom. Five subjects practiced slalom-like ski movements on a ski apparatus for 7 consecutive days. Results showed that at the early phases of learning, the joint angles of the lower limbs and torso displayed little movement, as expressed by their standard deviations and ranges of angular motion, whereas joint couplings were high, as shown by the relatively high cross correlations between joint angles. Over practice, angular movement significantly increased in all joint angles of the lower limbs and torso, although the cross correlations decreased. Support for the processes of freezing and releasing degrees of freedom was thus given at both levels of operationalization. In addition, a consistent change from laterally symmetric to laterally asymmetric cross-correlation patterns were observed as a function of practice. Overall, the findings provide empirical support for Bernstein's ideas regarding the mastery of redundant degrees of freedom in the acquisition of coordination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Constraints on the development of coordination,”
Newell, K. M. (1986) · Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4460-2_19 · Cited by 2,053
Self-citation
Cited by
Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination
Todorov, E., & Jordan, M. I. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn963 · Cited by 3,081
Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9 · Cited by 1,238
The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus
Wulf, G., McNevin, N., & Shea, C. H. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980143000118 · Cited by 1,163
Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning
Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196276 · Cited by 829
Instructions for Motor Learning: Differential Effects of Internal Versus External Focus of Attention
Wulf, G., Höß, M., & Prinz, W. (1998) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222899809601334 · Cited by 740
Metadata
- Authors
- Vereijken, B., Emmerik, R. E. A. V., Whiting, H. T. A., & Newell, K. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Motor Behavior
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-142
- ISSN
- 0022-2895 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1027
- OpenAlex
- W2037260614
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Free(z)ing Degrees of Freedom in Skill Acquisition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00222895.1992.9941608
- The paper
- Vereijken, B., Emmerik, R. E. A. V., Whiting, H. T. A., & Newell, K. M. (1992). Free(z)ing Degrees of Freedom in Skill Acquisition. Journal of Motor Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1992.9941608
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.